State Employees Credit Union
11 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2000–2025)
10 trusted published court opinions analyzed; 9 map to 9 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list State Employees Credit Union as an employer in 11 distinct federal employment cases between 2000 and 2025.
Of the 10 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 6 ended in a ruling for the employer, 3 were dismissed, and 1 ended in a ruling for the worker.
Plaintiffs won 1 of 10 adjudicated opinions (10%).
The most common claims on record were Breach Of Contract, Discrimination, and Whistleblower.
Cases were filed across 1 state (NC).
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 9 distinct cases.
1 of 10 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
State Employees Credit Union appears in 10 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Witherspoon v. State Employees Credit Union (2024) — Defendant Win. This case involved a civil rights dispute between an employee (Witherspoon) and the State Employees Credit Union. While the specific details of what happened aren't available from the court records provided, the case centered on civil rights claims filed in federal court. Read the ruling.
Witherspoon v. State Employees' Credit Union (2022) — Defendant Win. This case involved an employment law dispute between a worker named Witherspoon and the State Employees' Credit Union. The case was filed in August 2022, but the specific details about what workplace issue triggered the lawsuit are not available from the court records provided. Read the ruling.
Neal v. State Employees Credit Union (2020) — Dismissed. This case involved an employment law dispute between an employee named Neal and the State Employees Credit Union. Based on the available information, Neal filed a legal claim against their employer in May 2020, though the specific details of what workplace issue triggered the lawsuit are not clear from the court record… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Breach of Contract (2 of 10), Discrimination (2 of 10), Whistleblower. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Breach of Contract, Discrimination and Whistleblower.
Published opinions span North Carolina. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. North Carolina rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
10 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Trial verdict
- A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
States
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Finance employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.