JPMorgan Chase & Co.
159 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2003–2026)
27 trusted published court opinions across 26 distinct cases · 10 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
Public federal court records list JPMorgan Chase & Co. as an employer in 159 distinct federal employment cases between 2003 and 2026.
Of the 27 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 13 ended in a ruling for the employer, 4 ended in a ruling for the worker, 4 settled, and 3 were dismissed.
Plaintiffs won 4 of 21 adjudicated opinions (19%).
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Breach Of Contract.
Cases were filed across 8 states, most often in NY.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 26 distinct cases.
4 of 21 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
JPMorgan Chase & Co. appears in 27 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Matthew v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (2024) — Defendant Win. An employee with high blood pressure (hypertension) was fired from JP Morgan Chase Bank. The employee claimed she was terminated because of her disability and that the bank failed to make reasonable accommodations for her condition, as required by disability law. Read the ruling.
Radabaugh v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (2023) — Settlement. Workers at JPMorgan Chase & Co. claimed the bank failed to pay them overtime wages they had earned. This type of unpaid compensation is called wage theft. The employees filed a court case seeking payment for the hours they worked beyond their regular schedules. Read the ruling.
WILSON v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (2021) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved an employee named Wilson who filed discrimination claims against JPMorgan Chase Bank. Wilson alleged that the bank engaged in discriminatory practices during their employment, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not available from the court records. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (7 of 27), Wage Theft (4 of 27), Breach of Contract (4 of 27). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Breach of Contract.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADEA (29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634) — The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects employees and job applicants who are 40 years of age or older from discrimination based on age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, and other terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. FLSA (29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219) — The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments. ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADEA, FLSA, ADA reference pages for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADEA, FLSA and ADA.
Published opinions span New York (7), Ohio (4), Illinois (2), Pennsylvania (2). New York is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New York rulings, Ohio rulings, Illinois rulings and Pennsylvania rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
25 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 6 summary-judgment opinions, 5 ended the case in JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Finance employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.