JPMorgan Chase & Co.
171 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2009–2026)
8 trusted published court opinions across 8 distinct cases · 15 docket-only cases without a recorded end date
What public court records show
In public federal court records, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is named as a defendant in 171 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2009 and 2026.
Of the 8 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the employer, 2 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 settled, and 1 was dismissed.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wage Theft, and Retaliation.
Cases were filed across 5 states, most often in OH.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 8 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
JPMorgan Chase & Co. appears in 8 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Krautstrunk v. JPMorgan Chase & Company (2023) — Defendant Win. A worker filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Company claiming the bank discriminated against them based on disability. The worker wanted to have their case heard in court in front of a judge and jury. Read the ruling.
Radabaugh v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (2023) — Settlement. Workers at JPMorgan Chase & Co. claimed the bank failed to pay them overtime wages they had earned. This type of unpaid compensation is called wage theft. The employees filed a court case seeking payment for the hours they worked beyond their regular schedules. Read the ruling.
Burris v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company (2022) — Defendant Win. An employee at JPMorgan Chase & Company filed a whistleblower retaliation case, claiming the company punished them for reporting illegal or unethical conduct. The employee said the company violated federal whistleblower protection laws (Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank), which are designed to protect workers who speak up… Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination (4 of 8), Wage Theft (2 of 8), Retaliation (2 of 8). Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wage Theft and Retaliation.
Applicable statutes referenced across these rulings include: ADA (42 U.S.C. §§ 12111-12117) — The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in all aspects of employment. See the ADA reference page for filing deadlines, employee thresholds, and remedies. ADA.
Published opinions span Ohio (2), Arizona (2), New York (2), Connecticut (1). Ohio is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. Ohio rulings, Arizona rulings, New York rulings and Connecticut rulings.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
7 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
Of the 2 summary-judgment opinions, 1 ended the case in JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s favor and 1 let the worker’s claims continue.
What do these stages mean?
- Summary judgment
- A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Settlement / consent decree
- The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
7 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Employee v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Ct. App. · 2025
- Employee v. JPMorgan Chase BankS.D.N.Y. · 2020 · New York
- Employee v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYE.D. Pa. · 2020 · Pennsylvania
- Employee v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.9th Circuit · 2016
- Employee v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NANH · 2015
- Employee v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Adams)MAB · 2011
- Employee v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Na9th Circuit · 2010
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.