Union Planters Bank
2 distinct federal cases coded as employment matters from public court records (2000–2002)
3 trusted published court opinions across 2 distinct cases
What public court records show
In public federal court records, Union Planters Bank is named as a defendant in 2 federal cases coded as employment matters between 2000 and 2002.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 2 distinct cases.
About this employer
Union Planters Bank appears in 3 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Vance v. Union Planters Corp (2002) — Plaintiff Win. This case involved a female employee at Union Planters Bank who sued her employer for gender discrimination and failure to promote. The worker claimed the bank treated her unfairly because of her sex and denied her advancement opportunities that should have been available to her. Read the ruling.
Yvonne E. Vance v. Union Planters Corp., Union Planters Bank, N.A. (2002) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.
Vance v. Union Planters Corp. (2000) — Plaintiff Win. Yvonne Vance, an employee at Union Planters Bank, sued her employer claiming she was passed over for promotions because of her gender. She argued that the bank discriminated against her by failing to promote her to positions she was qualified for, violating federal civil rights laws that prohibit workplace sex discrimi… Read the ruling.
The published opinion involves a discrimination claim. Browse other discrimination rulings for comparable fact patterns and how courts have ruled. Discrimination.
These published opinions sit within the financial services sector, where Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections often supplement standard Title VII claims.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other court records naming this party
9 published opinions name this party but are not coded with an employment claim. Some are labor, unemployment or workers’ compensation matters whose claim type was not recorded; others are not employment disputes at all. They are not counted in any figure on this page, and no outcome is shown for them.
- Steve Wherry and Mary Hopkins, Co-Executors of the Estate of Margaret Archer v. EmployeeTenn. Ct. App. · 2007
- Employee v. Union Planters BankFla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Mo. Ct. App. · 2006
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Mo. Ct. App. · 2006
- Employee v. RogersMISS · 2005
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.7th Circuit · 2004
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank7th Circuit · 2004
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Ark. Ct. App. · 2004
- Employee v. Union Planters Bank, National Ass'nS.D. Miss. · 2004 · Mississippi
Other employers with published opinions
Browse trusted published opinions involving other employers.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.