Employment Rulings in the Eighth Circuit
The Eighth Circuit covers the federal courts in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,462 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,462 published rulings we track in the Eighth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,452 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 310 summary-judgment rulings here, 196 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 114 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Eighth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Eighth Circuit
Richardson v. Cardinal Ritter Institute Residential Services Corporation
Hossain
Burgess
Dowling
McDonough
Peck
A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279
Gompert
375 Slane Chapel Road, LLC v. Stone County, Missouri
Lamison
Dierbergs
Young
Poorfakhraei
Knight
Painters Local Union No. 1265 v.International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council No. 58, AFL-CIO
Amsted Rail Company, Inc. v. Hum Industrial Technology, Inc.
Meyers
Standifer
Local 513, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO v. Checkered Flag Excavation, Inc.
Baker
Meza
Baker
Icenogle
Adams
Brown
Xiong
St. Louis-Kansas City Carpenters Regional Council v. Millenium Installation Group, LLC
Axelsson
Benford
Sanders
Sanders
Sanders
Spann
Baker
Friedly
White
Walls
Shklyar
Nagel
Breckenridge O'Fallon, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 682
Streza
Hufker
Employers & Cement Masons 90 Health & Welfare Fund v. JMY Plastering Specialist, LLC
United States Department of Labor v. Federal Armament, LLC
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
Wayne Holstad v. U.S. Dept. of Labor
Baker
City Union Mission, Inc. v. Mike Sharp
Iron Workers St. Louis District Council Pension Trust Fund v. Elite Rebar, LLC
United Food and Commercial Workers Union v. Quality Pork Processors, Inc.
Showing 251–300 of 1,462 rulings · Page 6 of 30
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.