The Eleventh Circuit covers the federal courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,504 published rulings we track here (1968–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 1,504 published rulings we track in the Eleventh Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,492 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 352 summary-judgment rulings here, 232 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 120 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Eleventh Circuit covers.
American Civil Liberties Union v. Miami-Dade County School Board
Reis
Redner
Pope Ex Rel. Pope v. Cherokee County Bd. of Educ.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. RPH Management, Inc.
EEOC v. RPH Management, Inc.
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.
Edgar Hernando Rodriguez Posada v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
Young
Lamb
Novella
Samuel Adam Bush v. Washington Mutual
Juan Jorge Moncada Restrepo v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
Kadalie v. Board of Regents of the University of Georgia
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cagle's, Inc.
Sherk
Leopold O v. Enwonwu v. Trans Union, LLC
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local Union No. 991
Union Planters v. The People of the State of NY
National Labor Relations Board v. Chugach Management Services, Inc.
Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada
Vickery
Standifer
Bartlett
Georgia Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Adalberto Tovar-Alvarez v. U .S. Attorney General
Brandon
Dail
Triangle Construction & Maintenance Corp. v. Our Virgin Islands Labor Union
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. All Seasons Window & Door Manufacturing, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Kelly Bros. Sheet Metal
NLRB v. Kelly Brothers Sheet Metal, Inc.
Moore
National Union Fire Insurance v. Olympia Holding Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. Fisher Island Holdings, LCC
Jones
Diego Aristizabal Estrada v. U.S. Attorney General
National Ass'n of Air Traffic Specialists v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Jordan
Tom McAdams v. Francis J. Harvey
Powell
Gathright-Dietrich
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Blanca Hincapie-Cadavid v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
Southwest Florida Area Local American Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
Sphinx International, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
Sergio Posada v. James Cello, Inc.
Macola
Michelle Macola v. Government Employees
Janis
Showing 1,151–1,200 of 1,504 rulings · Page 24 of 31
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.