Employment Rulings in the Eleventh Circuit
The Eleventh Circuit covers the federal courts in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,807 published rulings we track here (1968–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,807 published rulings we track in the Eleventh Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,761 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 331 summary-judgment rulings here, 229 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 102 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Eleventh Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Eleventh Circuit
Wilke
Schofield
Advanced Masonry Associates, LLC v. NLRB
Shultz
Cooper
Stan McAdams v. The Jefferson County 911 Emergency Commuications District, Inc.
Headley
Stan McAdams v. The Jefferson County 911 Emergency Commuications District, Inc.
McGuire v. Intelident Solutions, LLC
Bowman
Fuller
Hamner
Oltmanns
Jurriaans
Norton
Allen
Armando Adames Rivas v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Adam Sabocik
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Security Walls, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Payne
Sheila Annette Cunningham v. Florida Credit Union
Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Granada Ins. Co.
Carlos Posadas Paguada v. U.S. Attorney General
Peeples
Richard P. Jahn, Jr. v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Dukes v. Suncoast Credit Union (In Re Dukes)
Celeste L. Guice v. Secretary, Department of Labor
Jones
Ala. Teachers Credit Union v. Design Build Concepts, Inc.
Monroe Cnty. Employees' Ret. Sys. ex rel. Situated v. S. Co.
Jones
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Michael B. Brown v. Secretary of Labor
Traver
Adam R. White v. Paul Freeman
Cowabunga, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Everglades College, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Norma A. Estrada v. U.S. Attorney General
Chris Payne v. DOCO Credit Union
Boswell
Transit Connection, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Boswell
Gee
Martin Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exel, Inc.
PECO Foods Inc. v. Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union Mid-South Council
Family Medicine Pharmacy, LLC v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
McAdam Props., LLC v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising, LLC
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Hanna Mercer
Showing 1,001–1,050 of 1,807 rulings · Page 21 of 37
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.