Employment Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit covers the federal courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track here (1970–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track in the Fifth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,689 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 297 summary-judgment rulings here, 188 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 108 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Fifth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
Adame
Marshall Durbin Poultry Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1991
Alexander
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Premier Operator Services, Inc.
Garner
Tillman
Condere Corporation v. Local Union 303L
Jones
Erly Industries v. M/V Chada Naree
Clancy
Estate of Bratton v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa
Nesfield
Bourgeois
Adam
Jackson v. United States Department of Labor
Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. v. Alexis Herman, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Adams
Local 100, Service Employees International Union v. Integrated Health Services, Inc.
Rhea
Adam
Scott Underwood Adam v. Itech Oil Company
Riley
Hays
Vance
Foster
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees
New Orleans Cold Storage & Warehouse Co., Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.
Kiger
Fuller
Norris
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.
Musser Davis Land Co. v. Union Pacific Resources
Herrington
Jarvis Christian College v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
White
Lee v. Henderson
Wayne
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, - Mary Boyle, Intervenor v. R.J. Gallagher Company
Owsley
Pioneer Concrete v. NLRB
Peavy
McCall
Taylor
Newsome
EEOC v. Dillard Dept Store
Sims
Lind
Carrabba
Borninski
Showing 1,501–1,550 of 1,704 rulings · Page 31 of 35
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.