Employment Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
The Fifth Circuit covers the federal courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track here (1970–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,704 published rulings we track in the Fifth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,689 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 297 summary-judgment rulings here, 188 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 108 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Fifth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Fifth Circuit
Amos
Zamora-Quezada
Housden
Harriman G. RADFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
HUBBARD BY HUBBARD v. Buffalo Indep. Sch. Dist.
Conger
Barnett
EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
NLRB v. Thermon Heat Tracing
Doe
Scott FALLO; Kasey Fallo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Miller v. Rowan Companies, Inc.
Doe
Hanna
Sorensen
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.
Esquivel
Thibodeaux
Muggivan
Abraham
Dancy
EEOC v. Pat O'Brien's Bar
USPS
NLRB v. Hi-Tech Cable Corp
NLRB v. Houston Building
NLRB v. Houston Building
Selby
UA
Selkirk Metalbestos, North America, Eljer Manufacturing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Exxon Corp.
Trencor, Inc v. NLRB
EEOC v. Hearst Corporation
Robinson
Lofton
Steele
Upshaw
Roark
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. R.J. Gallagher Co.
CJC Holdings, Inc v. NLRB
Cjc Holdings, Inc. v. NLRB
FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DURANT v. Lane & Douglass
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hearst Corporation, Doing Business as the Houston Chronicle Publishing Company
NLRB v. E-Systems, Inc
Smith v. Texaco, Inc.
NLRB v. Unitog Rental
NLRB v. Unitog Rental
Hughes Christenson v. NLRB
Dolores M. OUBRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Fuller
Manley
Showing 1,551–1,600 of 1,704 rulings · Page 32 of 35
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.