Employment Rulings in the First Circuit
The First Circuit covers the federal courts in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,014 published rulings we track here (1980–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,014 published rulings we track in the First Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 996 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 194 summary-judgment rulings here, 111 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 83 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- Abbott Laboratories9
- United States Postal Service7
- Abbott Laboratories, Inc.7
- Raytheon Company7
- First Union National Bank7
- Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada5
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the First Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the First Circuit
Rosenberg
CONNOLLY
Tveter
Justiniano
Flaherty v. Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc
Suzuki v. Abiomed, Inc.
Belezos
Veteran's Transportation Services v. Teamsters Local Union No. 25
ADAMS
Neronha
Monaco
Desai
Cooper
Elliott-Lewis
IN RE: G.E. ERISA LITIGATION
Merlini
Del Sesto v. Prospect CharterCARE, LLC
Del Sesto v. Prospect CharterCARE, LLC
Gonzalez-Bermudez
Chavira
LAUZON
Paul Dismukes v. Brandeis University
Bazile
Payne-Callender
Ouadani
Montoya
MacDonald
US EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. WAL-MART STORES INC
Pullman Arms, Inc. v. Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
PARASKEVOPOULOS
Posada
Bonbon
BURTON
Olivia Karpinski & Paul Edalat v. Union Leader Corporation, Patricia J. Grossmith, & Trent E. Spiner
Karpinski
Nagy
Caruso
Belezos
ADAMS
Merlini
Holmes
National Labor Relations Board v. NSL Country Gardens LLC
Strunk
Holmes
Patrick Short, et al. v. Civ. Amerada Hess Corp. et al.
Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al.
National Association of the Deaf v. Harvard University
Union of Concerned Scientists v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
McGuiggin
R. Lacey Colligan v. Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital, et al.
Showing 401–450 of 1,014 rulings · Page 9 of 21
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.