Employment Rulings in the First Circuit
The First Circuit covers the federal courts in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,014 published rulings we track here (1980–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,014 published rulings we track in the First Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 996 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 194 summary-judgment rulings here, 111 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 83 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- Abbott Laboratories9
- United States Postal Service7
- Abbott Laboratories, Inc.7
- Raytheon Company7
- First Union National Bank7
- Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada5
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the First Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the First Circuit
Sheckley
Massachusetts v. Mylan Laboratories
Hospital General Menonita v. National Labor Relations Board
McAdams
Adam
County of Suffolk v. Abbott Laboratories
National Union Fire Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
Satterfield
Bath Iron Works v. Workers Compensation
Local Union No. 12004, United Steelworkers v. Massachusetts
NLRB v. EAD Motors, et al.
Black v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America
Southern Union Co. v. Lynch
Nevada v. American Home Products Corp.
Stone v. First Union Corporation
Univar, USA, Inc. v. Teamsters Union Local 251
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Worldcom, Inc.
Canada
Hasan
Hasan
Ivy
Freeman v. First Union National
E.C. Waste, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Zamboni
Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Union Securities, Inc.
John Acevedo v. First Union National Bank, a Foreign Banking Corporation
González-Pérez
Thompson
Eon Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Associated Press v. UNION DE PERIODISTAS
Johnson v. SCHOOL UNION, 107
Adams
First Healthcare Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
O'Halloran v. First Union National Bank of Florida
Vescom Corp. v. MERRION REINSURANCE CO., LTD.
Kakides
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 93 Local 1370 v. Olympus Specialty & Rehabilitation Hospital
Scadif, S.A. v. First Union National
Safe Environment of America, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
Healy
Hazard
AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE COMPANY v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp.
Bath Iron Works Corp. v. United States Department of Labor
Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 791
Tennian
Montana v. Abbot Laboratories
Liston
McIntosh
Freeman v. First Union National
Trustees of Boston University v. Beacon Laboratories, Inc.
Showing 801–850 of 1,014 rulings · Page 17 of 21
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.