The Ninth Circuit covers the federal courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,198 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,198 published rulings we track in the Ninth Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,112 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 492 summary-judgment rulings here, 257 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 235 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Ninth Circuit covers.
Henderson v. Office & Professional Employees International Union
Martin
Griffith
Overstreet v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Local Union No. 1506
Overstreet
International Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 217 v. G.E. Chen Construction, Inc.
Karlins
Adam
Adam
Mariano
Rust
Claudette Lutz v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205 Governing Board of Glendale Union High School, District No. 205
Lutz
Cahill
Moore
In re Syncor Erisa Litigation
Great Basin Mine Watch v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Newmont Usa, Limited State of Nevada, Respondents-Intervenors
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Columbia Alaska Regional Hospital
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal Company
Casumpang
California State Legislative Bd., United Transp. Union v. Department of Transp.
Eeoc v. Peabody Coal Co.
Electronic & Space Technicians Local Union 1553 v. Raytheon Co.
General Construction Company Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp. v. Robert Castro Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. Cosco Fire Protection, Inc.
Tina Dierkes v. U.S. Department of Labor
Davis
Dierkes
Bonner
Bonner
Cubitt
Francisco-Farrell
Herchak
Moser
Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Local 2 v. Vista Inn Management Co.
Neason
National Labor Relations Board v. Earthgrains Baking Companies
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luby's Inc.
Castellanos Almada v. Ashcroft
Draw Pictures v. Trans Union Consumer Relations Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. George Joseph Orchard Siding, Inc.
Estrada
American Safety Casualty Insurance v. Nevada Risk Management, Inc.
Doe
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburg v. ESI Ergonomic Solutions, LLC
Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics v. United States Forest Service
Hanson
Eijinio Banuelos v. Construction Laborers' Trust Funds for Southern California
In Re Syncor ERISA Litigation
Dae Sung Lee v. United States Taekwondo Union
Showing 3,801–3,850 of 4,198 rulings · Page 77 of 84
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.