Skip to main content

Employment Rulings in the Ninth Circuit

The Ninth Circuit covers the federal courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.

Of the 1,784 published rulings we track here (1976–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.

How These Rulings Ended

Of the 1,784 published rulings we track in the Ninth Circuit.

Defendant Win
677 (38%)
Plaintiff Win
312 (17%)
Dismissed
304 (17%)
Remanded
225 (13%)
Mixed Result
135 (8%)
Settlement
131 (7%)

What Happens at Each Stage

A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,750 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.

Appeal
648 (37%)

A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.

Summary judgment
174 (10%)

A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.

Of the 174 summary-judgment rulings here, 108 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 66 let the worker’s claims continue.

Motion to dismiss
676 (39%)

An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.

Trial verdict
43 (2%)

A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.

Settlement / consent decree
131 (7%)

The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.

Default judgment
65 (4%)

A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.

Other rulings
13 (1%)

Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.

States in This Circuit

Browse rulings from courts in each state the Ninth Circuit covers.

Recent Rulings in the Ninth Circuit

Kim

Aug 18, 2021W.D. Wash.Plaintiff Win

Brooks

Aug 13, 2021E.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Olocki

Aug 13, 2021E.D. Cal.Dismissed

Trujillo

Aug 9, 2021E.D. Cal.Dismissed

Hubbard

Aug 6, 2021E.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Denson

Aug 5, 2021S.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Craig

Aug 4, 2021N.D. Cal.Settlement

Douglas B. Scott v. Standard Insurance Company

Aug 4, 2021C.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Fletcher

Aug 3, 2021D. IdahoDismissed

Tapia

Aug 3, 2021S.D. Cal.Settlement

Holmes

Aug 2, 2021D. Nev.Dismissed

Blankinship

Aug 2, 2021D. Ariz.Defendant Win

Tri-County Mechanical and Electrical, Inc. v. Local Union 41 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada

Jul 30, 2021D. Mont.Defendant Win

Parker

Jul 29, 2021N.D. Cal.Settlement

Patricia Grossman v. Hawaii Government Employees' A

Jul 29, 20219th CircuitDefendant Win

Hunter

Jul 28, 2021D. Nev.Defendant Win

Michelle Raith v. International Guiding Eyes Inc.

Jul 27, 2021C.D. Cal.Remanded

Kudatsky

Jul 26, 2021N.D. Cal.Settlement

Botta

Jul 26, 2021N.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Al Faustino De Guzman v. Pacifica of the Valley Corporation

Jul 23, 2021C.D. Cal.Remanded

Heyman

Jul 21, 2021D. Nev.Remanded

Cadena

Jul 21, 2021D. Nev.Defendant Win

Michael Fenske v. Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc.

Jul 21, 2021C.D. Cal.Remanded

Stillwell

Jul 20, 2021D. Or.Defendant Win

Darling

Jul 20, 2021N.D. Cal.Mixed Result

Desmond

Jul 19, 2021S.D. Cal.Defendant Win

DeFries

Jul 15, 2021D. Or.Defendant Win

Karl

Jul 15, 2021N.D. Cal.Settlement

Campbell

Jul 13, 2021D. IdahoPlaintiff Win

Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mesa Air Group Incorporated

Jul 13, 2021D. Ariz.Dismissed

NLRB v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.

Jul 12, 20219th CircuitPlaintiff Win

Carlos Marquez v. Toll Global Forwarding USA Inc.

Jul 6, 2021C.D. Cal.Dismissed

Uriel Arauz Masis v. Tire's Warehouse, LLC

Jun 30, 2021C.D. Cal.Remanded

Lutge

Jun 28, 2021E.D. Cal.Plaintiff Win

Adam Azimov v. Merrick Garland

Jun 28, 20219th CircuitDefendant Win

Huerta

Jun 25, 2021N.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Hassell

Jun 21, 2021N.D. Cal.Mixed Result

Erin Jones v. Marriott International, Inc.

Jun 17, 2021C.D. Cal.Remanded

Donahue

Jun 16, 2021N.D. Cal.Mixed Result

Smith v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Jun 15, 2021S.D. Cal.Settlement

Wehner

Jun 14, 2021N.D. Cal.Mixed Result

Mendez

Jun 11, 2021D. IdahoDismissed

De Bernardi v. City and County of San Francisco

Jun 1, 2021N.D. Cal.Settlement

Wright

Jun 1, 2021E.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Ochoa

May 28, 2021S.D. Cal.Dismissed

Murphy v. The Finish Line, Inc.

May 27, 2021N.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Stephens

May 21, 2021D. Or.Plaintiff Win

Charles Scott v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

May 21, 2021C.D. Cal.Defendant Win

Borelli

May 21, 2021E.D. Cal.Settlement

Board of Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers Local Union 1399 Health & Welfare Trust v. Summit Commercial Floors, Inc.

May 20, 2021S.D. Cal.Dismissed

Browse Other Circuits

Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.

Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.