Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,369 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 242 summary-judgment rulings here, 162 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 80 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CollegeAmerica Denver, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. JBS USA, LLC
Teamsters Local Union No. 455 v. National Labor Relations Board
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 880 Pension Fund v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.
Adams
Didier
Simms
United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. King Soopers, Inc.
Smith v. Adams County Combined Court, Co.
Padilla
Eller
Eisenhour v. Weber County
Eisenhour v. Weber County
Anil Vazirani v. Mark Heitz
Angell v. Fairmount Fire Protection District
Avants v. Prospect Mortgage, LLC
Adams
Lobato v. New Mexico Environment Department
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unit Drilling Co.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.
Tenille
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. 704 HTL Operating, LLC
Adams
James
Cruces
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Western Trading Co.
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Administrative Review Board
Overstreet ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. SFTC, LLC
Jaremko
Mizusawa
Volner
Society of Professional Engineering Employees v. Boeing Co.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Original Honeybaked Ham Co. of Georgia, Inc.
FMSHR
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Spud Seller, Inc.
In re Bank of America Wage & Hour Employment Litigation
Pinkey
Public Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. TriCore Reference Laboratories
Lederman
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Picture People, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Teamsters Local Union No. 523
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Moreland Auto Group, LLLP
Jaramillo
Jaramillo
Spradley
Wesson
MSHA
Morrison
Showing 1,001–1,050 of 1,434 rulings · Page 21 of 29
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.