Skip to main content
Claim Type

Wrongful Termination Cases

3,027 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1964–2026)

3,027
Total Rulings
27%
Plaintiff Win Rate

731 of 2671 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

$1,633,051
Avg Damages Awarded (324 prevailing cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
1346 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
731 (24%)
Mixed Result
353 (12%)
Dismissed
241 (8%)
Remanded
239 (8%)
Settlement
117 (4%)

Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
47 wrongful termination rulings
United States Postal Service
15 wrongful termination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
11 wrongful termination rulings
Union Pacific Railroad
9 wrongful termination rulings
Board of Education of the City of Chicago
8 wrongful termination rulings

Court Rulings (3,027)

Darryl White v. Detroit Edison Company, Utility Workers Union of America Afl-Cio, and Utility Workers Union of America Local 223
6th CircuitDec 22, 2006
Defendant Win
Johnson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals
DCDec 21, 2006
Defendant Win
Lozada
Cal. Ct. App.Dec 18, 2006
Defendant Win
Pellerin
Cal. Ct. App.Dec 18, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Willie Gordon v. Shafer Contracting Co., Inc., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus on Behalf Of
8th CircuitDec 6, 2006Minnesota
Defendant Win
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 1776 v. Excel Corp.
3rd CircuitDec 1, 2006
Mixed Result
Morelewicz
9th CircuitNov 17, 2006
Defendant Win
Duda
N.Y. App. Div.Nov 14, 2006
Defendant Win
Herman
E.D. Pa.Nov 8, 2006Pennsylvania
Mixed Result
Bowling
N.C. Ct. App.Oct 17, 2006

1. Appeal and Error — appealability — interlocutory order — substantial right Although plaintiff's appeal from the trial court's order dismissing his claim under the North Carolina Persons with Disabilities Protection Act is an appeal from an interlocutory order Page 816 based on the fact that two…

Defendant Win
Extendicare Health Services, Inc. v. District 1199p, Service Employees International Union
M.D. Pa.Oct 17, 2006Pennsylvania
Plaintiff Win
Midnight Rose Hotel v. NLRB
10th CircuitOct 6, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Midnight Rose Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
10th CircuitOct 6, 2006
Defendant Win
Greene
D.S.C.Sep 29, 2006South Carolina
Defendant Win
Hays
D. Nev.Sep 27, 2006Nevada
Dismissed
Boston Public Health Commission v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
Mass. App. Ct.Sep 20, 2006
Plaintiff Win$207,551 awarded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trans States Airlines, Inc.
8th CircuitSep 19, 2006
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trans States Airlines
8th CircuitSep 19, 2006Missouri
Defendant Win
Lomanto
3rd CircuitSep 12, 2006
Defendant Win
LoManto
3rd CircuitSep 12, 2006
Defendant Win
Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitSep 11, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Adams
6th CircuitAug 22, 2006Kentucky
Defendant Win
Hawley
D.D.C.Aug 21, 2006District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Amerco
9th CircuitAug 10, 2006Arizona
Defendant Win
Holsum De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
1st CircuitAug 8, 2006
Defendant Win
Herrera
VTAug 4, 2006
Remanded
Herrera
VTAug 4, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Adamson
10th CircuitAug 2, 2006
Defendant Win
Pendergraft
D. Kan.Aug 2, 2006Kansas
Defendant Win
Richard W. Drake v. Laboratory Corporation Of America Holdings
2nd CircuitJul 19, 2006
Remanded
Cuslidge
Mo. Ct. App.Jul 18, 2006
Plaintiff Win$100,000 awarded
Saurini
10th CircuitJul 18, 2006
Defendant Win
Temp-Masters, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
6th CircuitJul 17, 2006
Defendant Win
Bowers
Ohio Ct. App.Jul 13, 2006
Defendant Win
District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board
DCJun 29, 2006
Defendant Win
Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council 33, Local 934
Pa. Commw. Ct.Jun 20, 2006
Defendant Win
Wilson
D. Del.Jun 12, 2006Delaware
Defendant Win
International Transportation Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitJun 2, 2006
Defendant Win
Gaetano & Associates Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
2nd CircuitMay 16, 2006
Defendant Win
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 204 v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitMay 5, 2006
Plaintiff Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Local 26
1st CircuitApr 28, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Radakovic
MONTApr 25, 2006
Defendant Win
Kelly Norberg v. Labor Ready
8th CircuitApr 25, 2006
Defendant Win
New England Health Care Employees Union, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board
2nd CircuitApr 19, 2006
Plaintiff Win
New England Health Care Employees Union v. National Labor Relations Board
2nd CircuitApr 19, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Opw Fueling Components, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
6th CircuitApr 6, 2006
Plaintiff Win
OPW Fueling v. NLRB
6th CircuitApr 6, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Sundaram
E.D.N.Y.Mar 29, 2006New York
Defendant Win
Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
MASSSUPERCTMar 21, 2006
Plaintiff Win$65,294.07 awarded
Denny
9th CircuitMar 9, 2006
Defendant Win

Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.