Skip to main content
Claim Type

Wrongful Termination Cases

3,027 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1964–2026)

3,027
Total Rulings
27%
Plaintiff Win Rate

731 of 2671 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

$1,633,051
Avg Damages Awarded (324 prevailing cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
1346 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
731 (24%)
Mixed Result
353 (12%)
Dismissed
241 (8%)
Remanded
239 (8%)
Settlement
117 (4%)

Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
47 wrongful termination rulings
United States Postal Service
15 wrongful termination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
11 wrongful termination rulings
Union Pacific Railroad
9 wrongful termination rulings
Board of Education of the City of Chicago
8 wrongful termination rulings

Court Rulings (3,027)

Cogburn Health Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitFeb 24, 2006
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sidley Austin LLP
7th CircuitFeb 17, 2006Illinois
Plaintiff Win
Stephenson
NYFeb 16, 2006
Defendant Win
Engelhard Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
3rd CircuitFeb 14, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Engelhard Corp v. NLRB
3rd CircuitFeb 14, 2006
Defendant Win
Gibson
IdahoFeb 9, 2006
Defendant Win$8,528.89 at issue
Shelton
Conn.Feb 7, 2006
Plaintiff Win
Watkins
N.Y. App. Div.Feb 7, 2006
Defendant Win
Brian Dias William Mason, Sr. v. Jose Elique Michael Murray University and Community College System of Nevada University of Nevada, Las Vegas
9th CircuitFeb 6, 2006
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. International House of Pancakes
E.D. Mich.Jan 25, 2006Michigan
Mixed Result
National Labor Relations Board v. Velocity Express, Inc.
10th CircuitJan 17, 2006
Plaintiff Win$148,818.4 awarded
MEC Construction, Inc v. National Labor Relations Board
4th CircuitJan 13, 2006West Virginia
Defendant Win
James Seitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Merck & Co., Inc., Medical, Dental, and Long-Term Disability Program for Non-Union Employees
8th CircuitJan 10, 2006
Plaintiff Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Pan American Grain Co.
1st CircuitDec 22, 2005
Remanded
Providence Teachers' Union Local 958 v. City Council of Providence
RIDec 21, 2005
Defendant Win
New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of America
NYDec 20, 2005
Plaintiff Win
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP.
N.D. Ill.Dec 20, 2005Illinois
Plaintiff Win
Citizens Investment Services Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitDec 16, 2005
Plaintiff Win
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University/Commonwealth of Virginia v. Julio Emilio Posada
VACTAPPDec 13, 2005
Plaintiff Win$30,000 awarded
Schiappa
E.D.N.Y.Dec 12, 2005New York
Mixed Result
Bagenstose
DCDec 8, 2005
Defendant Win
Williams v. United States Department of Labor
4th CircuitNov 18, 2005
Defendant Win
Oliver
W.D. Ky.Nov 7, 2005Kentucky
Remanded
Int'l Brohd Elec 15 v. NLRB
7th CircuitOct 31, 2005
Plaintiff Win
Gargano & Associates v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
MASSSUPERCTOct 28, 2005
Mixed Result$77,483.8 awarded
Davidson
DCOct 27, 2005
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Avecia, Inc.
3rd CircuitOct 13, 2005
Mixed Result
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office v. Maricopa County Employee Merit System Commission
ARIZSep 21, 2005
Defendant Win
District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals
DCSep 15, 2005
Defendant Win
Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
6th CircuitAug 24, 2005
Defendant Win
Amalgamated Transit Union v. Decamp Bus Lines, Inc.
NJSUPERCTAPPDIVAug 19, 2005
Plaintiff Win$234 awarded
Drake
3rd CircuitAug 16, 2005
Defendant Win
Sanzo
E.D.N.Y.Aug 8, 2005New York
Defendant Win
McCollum
Federal CircuitAug 3, 2005
Mixed Result
Mitchell v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
N.D. Ill.Jul 15, 2005Illinois
Defendant Win
School Committee v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
Mass. App. Ct.Jul 12, 2005
Plaintiff Win$158,326.52 awarded
Norton Healthcare, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
6th CircuitJul 8, 2005
Plaintiff Win
Dogmanits
E.D. Pa.Jul 7, 2005Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 1-9 v. S.D. Warren Co.
D. Me.Jun 24, 2005Maine
Defendant Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Rockline Industries, Inc.
8th CircuitJun 21, 2005
Plaintiff Win
NLRB v. Rockline Ind.
8th CircuitJun 21, 2005
Plaintiff Win
U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
E.D. La.Jun 6, 2005Louisiana
Plaintiff Win$591,000 awarded
Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
D.C. CircuitMay 31, 2005
Remanded
Boudreault
MASSSUPERCTMay 25, 2005
Defendant Win
Midkiff
6th CircuitMay 24, 2005
Defendant Win
National Labor Relations Board v. Enjo Contracting Co.
2nd CircuitMay 19, 2005
Plaintiff Win
Bell v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
M.D. Fla.May 17, 2005Florida
Defendant Win
Minnesota Licensed Practical Nurses Association v. National Labor Relations Board, Alexandria Clinic P.A., Intervenor on Appeal
8th CircuitMay 11, 2005
Defendant Win
Guardian Auto Trim, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
6th CircuitMay 3, 2005
Defendant Win
Giedra
Wash. Ct. App.Apr 14, 2005
Plaintiff Win

Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.