The Ninth Circuit covers the federal courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,198 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,198 published rulings we track in the Ninth Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,112 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 492 summary-judgment rulings here, 257 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 235 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Ninth Circuit covers.
Stiner
Lorenzo Rivera v. Marriott International, Inc.
Jeremy Holland v. 3 Jays Liquor, Inc.
Guri Gonzalez v. LA Food Court Inc
Murray
Freedom Foundation v. Department of Labor & Industries
Gomez
Mar
Perez
Gonzalez
Kristine Adams v. Newport Crest Homeowners Ass'n
Rogelio Silva-Estrada v. William Barr
Yolver Estrada-Mendoza v. William Barr
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 525 Las Vegas, Nevada AFL-CIO v. Bombard Mechanical, LLC
John Herzfeld v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
French
Rutherford
Russell Rosco v. Trans Union LLC
McHenry
DeCosta
Arakji
Martin
Beard
Fisher
Greg Gibbons v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Wynnycky
(PS) Chavez v. Del Sol Farm Labor Services Inc.
Fulkerson
Rogers v. Lyft, Inc.
Fatima Galindo Tovar v. MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc.
Brooke
Newell
Trustees of the U.A. Union Local No. 290 Plumber, Steamfitter and Shipfitter Industry Pension Trust v. Puddletown Plumbing LLC
Waveseer of Nevada, LLC v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 711
Raudez
Bowman
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Norval Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Erhart
(PS) J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Estrada Alvarez
Barajas-Quijada
Garcia
Camilo
Sobaszkiewicz
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Vista Metals Corporation
Chambers
Perez
Capriole
Perez
Guri Gonzalez v. LA Food Court Inc
Eric P. v. Directors Guild of America
Showing 2,401–2,450 of 4,198 rulings · Page 49 of 84
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.