Skip to main content
Claim Type

Failure to Accommodate Cases

3,417 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18942026)

3,417
Total Rulings
14%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$1,166,440
Avg Damages (163 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Failure to Accommodate Claims

Failure to accommodate claims arise when an employer does not provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability or sincerely held religious belief. Under the ADA and Title VII, employers must engage in an interactive process to identify effective accommodations unless doing so would cause undue hardship. Common accommodations include modified schedules, assistive technology, and workplace modifications.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
1351 (40%)
Mixed Result
726 (21%)
Dismissed
497 (15%)
Plaintiff Win
480 (14%)
Remanded
220 (6%)
Settlement
143 (4%)

Court Rulings (3,417)

Ruggiero
W.D. Wash.May 5, 2025Washington
Defendant Win
Angela Standlee v. Abbott Laboratories
C.D. Cal.May 5, 2025California
Remanded
Kichamu
S.D. Tex.May 5, 2025Texas
Dismissed
Dominguez
S.D.N.Y.May 2, 2025New York
Dismissed
Kelly
D. Ariz.May 2, 2025Arizona
Mixed Result
Desiderio
S.D.N.Y.May 2, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Burnett
D. Md.May 2, 2025Maryland
Defendant Win
Kiley
N.D.N.Y.May 2, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Bong
D. Or.May 2, 2025Oregon
Defendant Win
Kirby
N.D.N.Y.May 1, 2025New York
Defendant Win
ELLIS, II v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
S.D. Ind.May 1, 2025Indiana
Defendant Win
J.B.
S.D.N.Y.Apr 28, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Nicholas
E.D.N.Y.Apr 28, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Fernandez
S.D.N.Y.Apr 28, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation v. Southern California Overhead Door Company, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Apr 28, 2025California
Defendant Win
Taylor
M.D. Pa.Apr 25, 2025Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Robert Mena v. Dana Point Tattoo LLC
C.D. Cal.Apr 24, 2025California
Defendant Win
Angel Garcia v. ZH Massage
C.D. Cal.Apr 24, 2025California
Dismissed
Tarondra Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Apr 24, 2025Ohio
Mixed Result
Erwine
D. Nev.Apr 23, 2025Nevada
Plaintiff Win$500,000 awarded
Maxwell
S.D. Ga.Apr 23, 2025Georgia
Dismissed
Chaudhary
S.D. Ala.Apr 22, 2025Alabama
Defendant Win
Webb
D. Colo.Apr 21, 2025Ohio
Mixed Result
L.B.
W.D. Wash.Apr 18, 2025Washington
Dismissed
Fernandez
S.D.N.Y.Apr 18, 2025Ohio
Dismissed
Fox
E.D. La.Apr 17, 2025Louisiana
Settlement
Rowe
S.D.N.Y.Apr 16, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Jesus Fuentes v. Bellingham Marine Industries, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Apr 16, 2025California
Dismissed
SPEAR
E.D. Pa.Apr 16, 2025Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
Daniel
N.D. Tex.Apr 15, 2025Texas
Defendant Win
Hudson
N.D. OhioApr 14, 2025Ohio
Dismissed
DOTAN
W.D. Pa.Apr 10, 2025Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
Yu
E.D.N.Y.Apr 10, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Peacock
E.D. Cal.Apr 9, 2025California
Defendant Win
Cojom
D. Conn.Apr 9, 2025Connecticut
Mixed Result
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.
D. Nev.Apr 8, 2025Nevada
Defendant Win
Gayhart
E.D.N.C.Apr 8, 2025North Carolina
Dismissed
Handberry
S.D.N.Y.Apr 7, 2025New York
Defendant Win
McDaniel
W.D. Ky.Apr 7, 2025Kentucky
Defendant Win
Collins
E.D. Mich.Apr 4, 2025Michigan
Defendant Win
Satterfield
N.D. Tex.Apr 3, 2025Texas
Defendant Win
Taylor
E.D.N.Y.Apr 2, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Brandon Henderson v. City of Los Angeles
C.D. Cal.Apr 2, 2025California
Dismissed
Midkiff
E.D. Va.Apr 2, 2025Virginia
Defendant Win
Rahman
S.D.N.Y.Mar 31, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Hill
N.D. Miss.Mar 31, 2025Mississippi
Plaintiff Win
Sow
S.D. OhioMar 31, 2025Ohio
Remanded
Mejia
E.D.N.Y.Mar 31, 2025New York
Dismissed
Aghatise
E.D. Tex.Mar 31, 2025Texas
Dismissed
Rogers v. Keurig Dr Pepper The American Bottling Company
D. Kan.Mar 31, 2025Kansas
Dismissed

Think you may have a failure to accommodate claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.