Failure to Accommodate Cases
1,843 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1970–2026)
262 of 1630 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
About Failure to Accommodate Claims
Failure to accommodate claims arise when an employer does not provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability or sincerely held religious belief. Under the ADA and Title VII, employers must engage in an interactive process to identify effective accommodations unless doing so would cause undue hardship. Common accommodations include modified schedules, assistive technology, and workplace modifications.
Case Outcomes
Top Employers in Failure to Accommodate Cases
Employers most frequently appearing in failure to accommodate rulings.
Court Rulings (1,843)
CIVIL - disability discrimination retaliatory discharge collateral estoppel res judicata grievance process used collective bargaining agreement statutory claims not barred separate not actually or necessarily litigated separate remedies are not jointly exhaustive summary judgment reasonable and…
Summary judgment/Disability discrimination and failure to accomodate
Civ.R. 56/summary judgment disability discrimination. The trial court erred by granting summary judgment in appellee's favor. Appellant presented evidence sufficient enough to create a genuine issue of material fact.
Limitations agreement contained in an employment application is enforceable as a contract where it is supported by consideration in the form of the employer's promise to review the prospective employee's application.
Showing 1,151–1,200 of 1,843 rulings · Page 24 of 37
Browse Other Claim Types
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Think you may have a failure to accommodate claim?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.