Skip to main content
Claim Type

Failure to Accommodate Cases

3,417 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18942026)

3,417
Total Rulings
14%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$1,166,440
Avg Damages (163 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Failure to Accommodate Claims

Failure to accommodate claims arise when an employer does not provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability or sincerely held religious belief. Under the ADA and Title VII, employers must engage in an interactive process to identify effective accommodations unless doing so would cause undue hardship. Common accommodations include modified schedules, assistive technology, and workplace modifications.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
1351 (40%)
Mixed Result
726 (21%)
Dismissed
497 (15%)
Plaintiff Win
480 (14%)
Remanded
220 (6%)
Settlement
143 (4%)

Court Rulings (3,417)

19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2168, Pens. Plan Guide P 23915v
8th CircuitMar 1, 1986
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works
N.D. Ill.Oct 30, 1985Illinois
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caribe Hilton International
D.P.R.Oct 25, 1984Puerto Rico
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. May & Co.
N.D. Ga.Sep 26, 1983Georgia
Mixed Result
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. H. S. Camp & Sons, Inc.
M.D. Fla.Jun 1, 1982Florida
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sambo's of Georgia, Inc.
N.D. Ga.Dec 30, 1981Georgia
Defendant Win
Giles
E.D. Mo.Sep 3, 1981Missouri
Mixed Result
Image (Inc. Mex.-Am. Gov't Emp.) v. Eeoc
D. Colo.May 3, 1979Colorado
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Picoma Industries, Inc.
S.D. OhioJul 26, 1978Ohio
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Datapoint Corp.
Unknown CourtJun 28, 1978
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. E. I. duPont De Nemours & Co.
D. Del.Jan 25, 1978Delaware
Plaintiff Win
Eeoc v. Loc. 2p, Litho. & Photoengravers Iu
D. Md.Feb 26, 1976Maryland
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638
S.D.N.Y.Jul 18, 1975New York
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.
S.D. Ala.Jan 24, 1974Alabama
Dismissed
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipefitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Local Union No. 189
6th CircuitFeb 3, 1971
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry, Local Union No. 189
Unknown CourtApr 14, 1970
Plaintiff Win
Lewis
Unknown CourtJul 11, 1894Pennsylvania

<p>Appeal, No. 169, July T., 1893, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Union Co., Dec. T., 1888, No. 66, on verdict for plaintiff.</p> <p>Ejectment against tenants in possession for undivided one half of tract of land in Kelly township, known as the “ Clingan Farm.” Before McClubb, P. J.</p> <p>The evidence on behalf of defendant was summed up in the third assignment of error as follows:</p> <p>“That John L. Lewis died on May 20, 1869, leaving to survive him, five children : Thomas S. Lewis, the plaintiff; and Mrs. Rebecca Lamb, Mrs. Deborah Harris, Miss Sarah J. Lewis, Mrs. Martha E. Zeigler, his daughters, the defendants.</p> <p>“ That about the year 1841, John L. Lewis, the father, purchased a tract of land in Centre county, of about 600 acres, and moving to that place, at that early date, being then a man of over 60 years of age, proceeded to make provision for his family. He had at that time another son, named Reese. He divided the land into three parts — one end of 150 acres for Thomas, the other end for Reese of 150 acres, the center portion for himself and daughters. Houses and barns were erected on the premises, the whole family working together, the means coming from the father. Both Reese and Thomas were unmarried. The enjoyment of the one part was given to Thomas, although no deed was executed to him or to Reese, the father remarking that they would get them in time. Reese died unmarried and without issue. John L. Lewis sold Reese’s part and the central part, realizing about the sum of $12,000 to $15,000, and as there were about 20 acres adjoining Thomas, which the purchaser did not want, it was thrown over into Thomas’s farm, making it about 173 acres, 30 perches, and is known in this proceeding as the ‘ Centre county farm.’</p> <p>“ In 1855 he purchased what is known as the Homestead, at Lewisburg, and removed there.</p> <p>“ In 1855 he purchased what is known as the Clingan farm, (the undivided half of which is the subject of this action), for $2,56

Defendant Win

Think you may have a failure to accommodate claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.