Wrongful Termination Cases
6,866 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1863–2026)
About Wrongful Termination Claims
Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.
Case Outcomes
Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases
Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.
Court Rulings (6,866)
Summary judgment judgment on the pleadings retaliation R.C. 4112.02(I) adverse employment action breach of fiduciary duty wrongful termination in violation of public policy self-serving affidavits notice of appeal. Summary judgment in favor of defendants affirmed where plaintiff-employee failed to establish a materially adverse employment action beyond a mere inconvenience, which is not actionable. Trial court properly granted judgment on the pleadings on plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty where there was no legal basis on which to bring such a claim for an employment action taken against her by a public-school board. Trial court properly granted judgment on the pleadings on plaintiff's claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy where plaintiff had an adequate legal remedy for retaliation pursuant to R.C. 4112.02(I).
Showing 1,101–1,150 of 6,866 rulings · Page 23 of 138
Browse Other Claim Types
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.