Skip to main content
Claim Type

Wrongful Termination Cases

6,866 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18632026)

6,866
Total Rulings
23%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$1,340,684
Avg Damages (488 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3045 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
1585 (23%)
Mixed Result
1115 (16%)
Remanded
569 (8%)
Dismissed
460 (7%)
Settlement
91 (1%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.

Court Rulings (6,866)

Chima
N.D. Cal.Dec 2, 2025California
Defendant Win
Bruce Belland Trucking, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
WISCTAPPDec 2, 2025
Defendant Win
N.D. Cal.Dec 2, 2025California
Dismissed
C.D. Cal.Dec 1, 2025California
Remanded
NASH
M.D. Ga.Nov 26, 2025Georgia
Defendant Win
Kingston
D. Mass.Nov 26, 2025Massachusetts
Mixed Result
Armada
NYSUPCTKINGSNov 25, 2025
Mixed Result
Garcia
D.S.C.Nov 25, 2025South Carolina
Defendant Win
C.D. Cal.Nov 19, 2025California
Settlement
Morales
M.D. Fla.Nov 18, 2025Florida
Defendant Win
Isham
S.D. OhioNov 18, 2025Ohio
Defendant Win
Hughes
E.D. Tex.Nov 18, 2025Texas
Settlement$1,500,000 awarded
Rachel Gottschalk V. Washington State Employment Security Department
Wash. Ct. App.Nov 17, 2025
Defendant Win
S.D. OhioNov 13, 2025Ohio
Plaintiff Win
Harry P. Mendoza v. City of New Orleans and Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
La. Ct. App.Nov 12, 2025
Defendant Win
Byrd
E.D. Cal.Nov 7, 2025California
Settlement$1,500,000 awarded
Rackovan
M.D. Pa.Nov 7, 2025Pennsylvania
Mixed Result
Silos
D. Neb.Nov 7, 2025Nebraska
Mixed Result
Griffin
E.D. Tenn.Nov 6, 2025Tennessee
Plaintiff Win
E.D. Cal.Nov 6, 2025Oregon
Mixed Result
Ney
Ohio Ct. App.Nov 6, 2025

summary judgment; de novo; wrongful termination; breach of employment agreement; at will employment; promissory estoppel; disciplinary policy; legitimate business reason; defamation; Greeley claim.

Defendant Win
Darden
S.D. Miss.Nov 5, 2025Mississippi
Dismissed
Dunn
E.D.N.Y.Nov 4, 2025West Virginia
Defendant Win
C.D. Cal.Nov 3, 2025West Virginia
Defendant Win
Cooley
E.D. Tex.Nov 3, 2025Texas
Mixed Result
LKQ Automotive D/B/A Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. and Jesus Duron v. Adan Robert Romo
Tex. App.—8th Dist.Oct 31, 2025
Plaintiff Win
Stewart
N.D. OhioOct 31, 2025Ohio
Defendant Win
Pinheiro
S.D.N.Y.Oct 31, 2025New York
Defendant Win
LaNetra Kellar v. The Yunion, Inc.
6th CircuitOct 31, 2025
Defendant Win
N.D. OhioOct 30, 2025Wisconsin
Mixed Result
C.D. Cal.Oct 30, 2025California
Defendant Win
S.D.N.Y.Oct 30, 2025New York
Remanded
Tao
D. Kan.Oct 30, 2025Wisconsin
Dismissed
Fennell
D. Md.Oct 30, 2025Maryland
Defendant Win
Neydin Gaspar, on behalf of the Estate of Lenin Estrada Salgado v. The Last Resort Operations, LLC
Wash. Ct. App.Oct 30, 2025
Defendant Win
Mattison
D. Md.Oct 29, 2025Maryland
Defendant Win
Krausman
Conn. App. Ct.Oct 28, 2025

The plaintiff insured appealed from the trial court's judgment for the defen- dant insurance company on her amended complaint alleging a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in an insurance dispute concerning underinsured motorist benefits. She claimed, inter alia, that the court improp- erly granted the defendant's motion to bifurcate and stay discovery. Held: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to bifurcate and stay discovery, as the court reasonably could have concluded that bifurcation of the claims served interests of convenience and judicial efficiency and may have negated the need to litigate certain other issues. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for an order of compliance with her discovery requests, as the defendant eventually filed a notice of compliance and the plaintiff did not allege any prejudice resulting from the defendant's delay in complying with her discov- ery requests. This court declined to reach the merits of the plaintiff's claim that the trial court erred with respect to certain legal and factual determinations, as the plaintiff failed to furnish an adequate record for review. The trial court applied a proper legal standard in ruling on the counts of the plaintiff's complaint alleging that the defendant failed to act in good faith pursuant to a provision of CUTPA and that it acted in bad faith in violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as the court reasonably could have concluded, in light of the evidence and the related findings of fact, that the plaintiff failed to satisfy her burden of demonstrating that the defendant had acted in bad faith. Argued October 29, 2024—officially released October 28, 2025

Defendant Win
Sanchez Garcia, Marta Del Mar v. Environmental Quality Laboratories Inc
PRAPPOct 28, 2025
Defendant Win
Lefevra
D. Mass.Oct 28, 2025Massachusetts
Dismissed
Islam
E.D.N.Y.Oct 28, 2025New York
Dismissed
N.D. OhioOct 28, 2025Ohio
Dismissed
Tracy Auto, Lp Dba Tracy Toyota v. National Labor Relations Board
9th CircuitOct 28, 2025
Plaintiff Win
Marigny
E.D. Wis.Oct 27, 2025Wisconsin
Defendant Win
E.D.N.Y.Oct 26, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Waid
E.D. Mich.Oct 24, 2025Washington
Mixed Result
D. IdahoOct 24, 2025Idaho
Plaintiff Win
Rojas
S.D.N.Y.Oct 24, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Harold Wright v. Deaconess Union County Hospital
Ky. Ct. App.Oct 24, 2025
Defendant Win
Pauliah
S.D. Miss.Oct 23, 2025Mississippi
Defendant Win
C.D. Ill.Oct 23, 2025Illinois
Plaintiff Win$160,000 awarded

Showing 151200 of 6,866 rulings · Page 4 of 138

Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.