Skip to main content
Claim Type

Wrongful Termination Cases

3,027 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1964–2026)

3,027
Total Rulings
27%
Plaintiff Win Rate

731 of 2671 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.

$1,633,051
Avg Damages Awarded (324 prevailing cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
1346 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
731 (24%)
Mixed Result
353 (12%)
Dismissed
241 (8%)
Remanded
239 (8%)
Settlement
117 (4%)

Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
47 wrongful termination rulings
United States Postal Service
15 wrongful termination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
11 wrongful termination rulings
Union Pacific Railroad
9 wrongful termination rulings
Board of Education of the City of Chicago
8 wrongful termination rulings

Court Rulings (3,027)

Thomas Overby, Jr. v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC
4th CircuitJun 15, 2026Virginia
Remanded
Jaleelah Hassan Ahmed v. Hamtramck Pub. Schs.
6th CircuitJun 15, 2026Michigan
Remanded
Mary Ann Moreno, Plaintiff: v. Circle K Stores, Inc. Defendant:
Colo.Jun 15, 2026Colorado
Remanded
Lazarus Coal, LLC v. Abram Scott Adkins
Ky. Ct. App.Jun 12, 2026Kentucky
Plaintiff Win$8,000 awarded
David Stone v. Pima County
ARIZCTAPPJun 11, 2026Arizona
Remanded
Crawford v. Salve Regina University
1st CircuitJun 11, 2026Rhode Island
Defendant Win
Gorgia v. Dolan
N.Y. App. Div.Jun 10, 2026New York
Defendant Win
Anderson v. Bdo USA, P.C.
D.D.C.Jun 9, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Kay v. Banchik
N.Y. App. Div.Jun 9, 2026New York
Mixed Result
Monroe County Board of Education v. Barbarietta Turner-Pugh
Ala. Civ. App.Jun 5, 2026Alabama
Defendant Win
Choi v. Tachibana Enterprises, LLC
Haw.Jun 4, 2026Hawaii
Plaintiff Win
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. Comprehensive Healthcare Management Services LLC
3rd CircuitJun 3, 2026Pennsylvania
Mixed Result$35,804,438.2 awarded
James Mebane v. GKN Driveline North America, Inc.
4th CircuitJun 2, 2026North Carolina
Dismissed
Brown v. Exxon Mobil
Tex. Bus. Ct.May 29, 2026Texas
Remanded
Dargan v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals
DCMay 28, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Kathleen Hayes v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
7th CircuitMay 28, 2026Illinois
Mixed Result
Lilly v. State of New York
N.Y. App. Div.May 26, 2026New York
Mixed Result
MATTHEW HAWN v. SULLIVAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Tenn. Ct. App.May 26, 2026Tennessee
Mixed Result
Franceschi-Rodriguez v. Perdue Foods, LLC
DELSUPERCTMay 22, 2026Delaware
Plaintiff Win
Pearson v. Caci
D.D.C.May 19, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Angela Kendall v. Zoltek Corporation
8th CircuitMay 18, 2026Missouri
Defendant Win
Frantz v. XL Diamonds LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 14, 2026New York
Defendant Win
Yormick v. King David Post Acute Nursing & Rehab., L.L.C.
Ohio Ct. App.May 14, 2026Ohio
Plaintiff Win
Daniel Paris v. MacAllister Machinery Co., Inc.
6th CircuitMay 14, 2026Michigan
Defendant Win
Stellar Virtual Texas v. Sandra Aguilar
Tex. App.—13th Dist.May 14, 2026Texas
Dismissed
Frantz v. XL Diamonds LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 14, 2026New York
Defendant Win
Banasik v. Mount Sinai Health Sys.
N.Y. App. Div.May 14, 2026New York
Defendant Win
Banasik v. Mount Sinai Health Sys.
N.Y. App. Div.May 14, 2026New York
Defendant Win
Vanison v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
D.D.C.May 12, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v. Engolos LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026New York
Plaintiff Win$61,320 awarded
Farmer v. Mizuho Sec. USA LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026New York
Plaintiff Win
Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v. Engolos LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026New York
Plaintiff Win$61,320 awarded
Pescales v. Pax Ventures LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026New York
Plaintiff Win
Pescales v. Pax Ventures LLC
N.Y. App. Div.May 12, 2026New York
Plaintiff Win
Dehaarte v. District of Columbia
D.D.C.May 11, 2026District of Columbia
Mixed Result
Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
D.D.C.May 8, 2026District of Columbia
Mixed Result
Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
D.D.C.May 8, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Hayes v. GStek
5th CircuitMay 8, 2026Louisiana
Defendant Win
Evans v. Individual Advocacy Group, Inc
D.D.C.May 7, 2026District of Columbia
Plaintiff Win
Danziger v. United States
Fed. Cl.May 7, 2026District of Columbia
Plaintiff Win
Williams v. Legacy Health
9th CircuitMay 6, 2026Washington
Defendant Win
Martin, S. v. Thomas Chevrolet
Pa. Super. Ct.Apr 21, 2026Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
Christine Tedder v. Harris Teeter, Employer
SCCTAPPApr 15, 2026South Carolina
Plaintiff Win
Searcy v. Vilsack
D.D.C.Apr 14, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Dickten Masch Plastics, LLC and Employers Preferred Insurance Company v. Debra Lee Stuart
IOWACTAPPApr 1, 2026Iowa
Plaintiff Win
Jeremy Skidmore v. Michael Schinke
4th CircuitMar 30, 2026Virginia
Remanded
Donner v. Fox News Network, LLC
D.D.C.Mar 30, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Krishnan Ghosh v. Abbott Laboratories
8th CircuitMar 26, 2026Minnesota
Defendant Win
Sloan v. Delaware State University
DELSUPERCTMar 24, 2026Delaware
Defendant Win
Lucas v. Casillas Guzman
D.D.C.Mar 23, 2026District of Columbia
Defendant Win

Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.