Employment Rulings in the Third Circuit
The Third Circuit covers the federal courts in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 2,094 published rulings we track here (1967–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 2,094 published rulings we track in the Third Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 2,060 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 357 summary-judgment rulings here, 219 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 137 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- Trans Union, LLC9
- United States Postal Service8
- Abbott Laboratories8
- D.A. Nolt, Inc.8
- East Penn Manufacturing Company, Inc.7
- BP Exploration & Production, Inc.7
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Third Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Third Circuit
KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, LLC v. LOCAL 464A UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION WELFARE SERVICE BENEFIT FUND
MILANO
Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. Andor Health, LLC
Higgins
INTERRANTE
VEIKOS
SCALIA
Matias
IBEW LOCAL UNION 351 WELFARE FUND v. GERBER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company v. Estate of Jefffrey Rolison
LAMBADARIOS MOFFETT v. WOODLAKE PROPERTIES, LLC
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ARNOLD WALTER NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE PENSION FUND AND TRUSTEES THEREOF v. LANGHAN DEVELOPMENT LLC
Range
TRUDNOS
A.F.
PUSKAR
PRATER
PRATER
Independent Laboratory Employe v. ExxonMobil Research and Engine
Schuylkill County Inmates v. Commissioners of Centre County
MAMMEN, M.D., M.P.H. v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
ADAM
Grajales-El
SIMON
NEWSOME
HILL
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. DANCO PAINTING, LLC
Whirlpool Corporation v. Davide Cabri
VANLOAN
Anderson
MCMANUS
DuPont Specialty Products USA v. NLRB
WELCH FOODS, INC. v. GENERAL TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 397
Eisenhuth
BRUCE
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. SKY HIGH MANAGEMENT, LLC
Goldstein
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND v. MEG TACKLE IMPORTS, INC
JACKSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
IVANOVS
CALIO
COPLEY
GARDNER
ITT Engineered Valves, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO CLC, Local 36M
GUARINO
CHRISTOPHERSON
ANGELOPOULOS
Drumheiser
HAHN
Showing 851–900 of 2,094 rulings · Page 18 of 42
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.