Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,369 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 242 summary-judgment rulings here, 162 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 80 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Eastman
Beugler
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thorman & Wright Corp.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thorman & Wright Corp.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joslin Dry Goods Co.
EEOC v. Joslin Dry Goods Co.
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.
Colbert
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Phoenix, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Community Health Services, Inc.
Clarke
Adair Group, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Estrada
Hall
National Labor Relations Board v. King Soopers, Inc.
Boyles
Panther
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Equal Employment Opp v. Burlington Northern
Geddes
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Heartway Corp.
Midnight Rose Hotel v. NLRB
Midnight Rose Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Credit Union Group Enterprises LLC v. Kansas Department of Credit Unions
Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings
Chaffin
Chaffin
Brotherhood
In Re Sprint Corp. Erisa Litigation.
Adamson
Pendergraft
Trevizo
Trevizo v. Adams
Adams
Adams
Saurini
Saurini
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 2263 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Douglass
Honeyville Grain, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Nicodemus
Nicodemus v. Union Pacific Corporation
Andrews
National Labor Relations Board v. Velocity Express, Inc.
Union Pacific Railroad v. Dolese Bros.
Inergy Propane, LLC v. Union Bank
Equal Employment Commission v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Neal
Showing 1,151–1,200 of 1,434 rulings · Page 24 of 29
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.