Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,369 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 242 summary-judgment rulings here, 162 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 80 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Vinton
Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Continental Carbon Co.
Sandoval
Anderson
Phillips
In re Williams Companies Erisa Litigation
Thierry
Norris
Double Eagle Hotel & Casino v. National Labor Relations Board
Croy
Boeing Wichita Credit Union v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business, Trust
Brisco
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. National Labor Relations Board
Public Service Company Of Colorado v. National Labor Relations Board
Board of County Commissioners v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Baker
Bailey
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Great Plains Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Valdez
Lackey Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 226
Omasta
Sisco
Daily
City Market, Inc. v. Local 7 United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
Cytrynbaum
Benson
National Labor Relations Board v. CHS Community Health Systems, Inc.
Finley
French
Cunningham
Murphy v. Facet 58, Inc.
Kerry
Kraus
Skier's Edge Co. v. Ladapa Die & Tool, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. GMRI, Inc.
Buonanno
Amadasu
Adams
Mid-Continent
Keating
Horn
Blagg
Webco Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
In Re Nave
NewCap Insurance v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo of San Juan
In Re Gordon
National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate Builders, Inc.
Brickey
Guadano
Showing 1,201–1,250 of 1,434 rulings · Page 25 of 29
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.