Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,369 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 242 summary-judgment rulings here, 162 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 80 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W.H. Braum, Inc.
Curry
Croy
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Adams v. Kinder-Morgan, Inc.
Ware
Buck
Adams
Campbell
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Company
McDermott
Henderson v. International Union
Adams
Parker
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local 5-391 v. Conoco, Inc.
Swenson
Keating
Adam
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Voss Electric Co.
Conatzer
Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National Insurance
Local 5-857 Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Conoco Inc.
Ellison
Dalton
Nicodemus
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. National Labor Relations Board
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dillon Companies
Tinker Air Force Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Tinker Air Force Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Herrera
Carlton
Kittel
National Union Fire Insurance v. LSB Industries, Inc.
Ayala
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.
Nance
Utah Alcoholism Foundation v. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories-Non-Bargaining Unit Employees' Comprehensive Medical Benefits Plan
Inga F. Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation Doing Business as Tricore Reference Laboratories
Dave Chandler Daniel Hayes Cheryl St. John Robert G. Prokop v. The City of Arvada, Colorado
Lejeune
American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 1592 v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Syed M.A. Hasan v. United States Department of Labor, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation, Intervenor
Peppers
Allen Marshall Std. v. Union Pacific
Estrada
Hagerman
Earnest
Spaulding v. United Transportation Union
Spaulding
Ellison
Showing 1,251–1,300 of 1,434 rulings · Page 26 of 29
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.