Employment Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
The Tenth Circuit covers the federal courts in Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track here (1972–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 1,434 published rulings we track in the Tenth Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,369 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 242 summary-judgment rulings here, 162 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 80 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Tenth Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Tenth Circuit
Hendrix
Powell
McClaran
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo of San Juan
Timothy Hatten v. Joe White, Employee, Usp Leavenworth Justin C. Harsha, Employee, Usp Leavenworth A. Fekekte, Employee, Usp Leavenworth
National Labor Relations Board v. King Soopers, Inc.
Silva
Rubia
Nicodemus
Cirulis
Public Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance
Adargo
Moore
Mj Metal Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Mj Metal Products, Inc.
Moncada
Wright
Adkins
MJ Metal Products v. NLRB
Prickett
Adams
National Labor Relations Board v. Reliable Electric Construction Co.
Commercial Union Insurance v. Sea Harvest Seafood Co.
Robinson
Lewis
Thompson
Michael I. Kroll v. Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Chief Counsel for the New York State Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District
Oil, Chemical, & Atomic Workers International Union v. Conoco, Inc.
Stauth
Lloyd
Brotherhood
Payne
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Swift Transportation Co.
Adams
Jeremias Silva v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, a National Labor Union, and Luis Arellano, Evelina Marquez
NLRB v. Pueblo of San Juan
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo of San Juan
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo Of San Juan
Kozeny
Whitehat
Adams
Negron
Local No. 7 United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. King Soopers, Inc.
Horizon/CMS
Paper, Allied, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 5-508 v. Slurry Explosive Corp.
Sharp
Webco Industries, Inc. v. Natioanal Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Triple C Maintenance, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Oklahoma Installation Co.
Showing 1,301–1,350 of 1,434 rulings · Page 27 of 29
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.