Skip to main content
Claim Type

Discrimination Cases

8,273 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18892026)

8,273
Total Rulings
13%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$2,887,299
Avg Damages (491 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Discrimination Claims

Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3509 (42%)
Dismissed
1451 (18%)
Mixed Result
1450 (18%)
Plaintiff Win
1114 (13%)
Remanded
605 (7%)
Settlement
143 (2%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Discrimination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
94 discrimination rulings
United States Postal Service
55 discrimination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
32 discrimination rulings
United Parcel Service, Inc.
28 discrimination rulings
New York State Department of Labor
28 discrimination rulings

Court Rulings (8,273)

Constantino-Gleason
W.D.N.Y.Jun 16, 2023New York
Mixed Result
Trustees of the Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Local 162 Pension Fund v. Bruner Corporation
S.D. OhioJun 16, 2023Ohio
Defendant Win
Hudson
D.D.C.Jun 16, 2023District of Columbia
Plaintiff Win$413,855 awarded
Madrid
D. IdahoJun 15, 2023Idaho
Defendant Win
Ohring
W.D. Wash.Jun 14, 2023Washington
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Telecare Mental Health Services of Washington Inc
W.D. Wash.Jun 12, 2023Washington
Defendant Win
Marcelo
W.D. Wash.Jun 9, 2023Washington
Defendant Win
Wingra Redi-Mix Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
WISCTAPPJun 8, 2023
Plaintiff Win
NARDELLI
W.D. Pa.Jun 8, 2023Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Winesburg
W.D. Mo.Jun 8, 2023Missouri
Remanded
Deak
S.D.N.Y.Jun 7, 2023Minnesota
Mixed Result
Hockaday
D.D.C.Jun 6, 2023District of Columbia
Defendant Win
Adams
S.D.N.Y.Jun 6, 2023New York
Settlement
Mayweather
D. Nev.Jun 5, 2023Nevada
Defendant Win
Garofalo
E.D.N.Y.Jun 2, 2023New York
Mixed Result
La Riccia v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm.
Ohio Ct. App.Jun 1, 2023

Ohio Civil Rights Commission discrimination disability R.C. 4112.06 R.C. 4112.05 Americans with Disabilities Act, App.R. 12 App.R. 16 abuse of discretion OCRC record pre-complaint investigation no probable cause finding. Pro se appellant filed a complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission against the Cleveland Clinic Foundation alleging that the hospital discriminated against her based on her disability because the hospital denied her provider of choice after the appellant sent numerous inappropriate messages to her doctor through the hospital's MyChart messaging system. The OCRC made a finding of no probable cause and dismissed her complaint. On appeal to the trial court, the court upheld the commission's decision. On appeal to this court, appellant argued that the OCRC submitted an incomplete record to the trial court, the trial court ignored her evidence, and the OCRC misinterpreted the law. The OCRC did not submit an incomplete record to the trial court and the trial court did not err when it did not consider the pro se appellant's additional filings because they were not part of the commission's record and the trial court determined that it would only consider the commission's record and the parties' briefs. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the OCRC's finding of no probable cause is not unlawful, irrational, arbitrary or capricious. Appellant did not show that her behavior was caused by her alleged mental disability, but even if she had so shown, the hospital did not terminate the physician-patient relationship because of appellant's alleged disability. The hospital offered to assist appellant to find another provider within the hospital system that could provide more suitable treatment.

Defendant Win
Lawson
N.D. Cal.May 30, 2023California
Defendant Win
Vellali
D. Conn.May 30, 2023Connecticut
Defendant Win
Vellali
D. Conn.May 30, 2023Connecticut
Mixed Result
Igartua
E.D.N.Y.May 30, 2023New York
Plaintiff Win
Vellali
D. Conn.May 30, 2023Connecticut
Plaintiff Win
LAMIA
W.D. Pa.May 26, 2023Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Hobbs
D. Ariz.May 26, 2023Arizona
Dismissed
Ray
W.D. Tenn.May 26, 2023Tennessee
Remanded
Cairns
E.D. Tex.May 25, 2023Georgia
Defendant Win
Jones
N.D. Okla.May 25, 2023Oklahoma
Defendant Win
HONAUER
D.N.J.May 25, 2023New Jersey
Defendant Win
HILLS
D.N.J.May 23, 2023New Jersey
Mixed Result
BURK
D.N.J.May 22, 2023New Jersey
Mixed Result
Christians in the Workplace Networking Group v. National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
D.N.M.May 18, 2023New Mexico
Defendant Win
WALTERS
D.N.J.May 18, 2023New Jersey
Defendant Win
Weber
E.D. Cal.May 16, 2023California
Dismissed
Morrison
E.D.N.Y.May 16, 2023New York
Defendant Win
Deering
E.D. Mich.May 16, 2023Michigan
Plaintiff Win$150,000 awarded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. East 40, Inc.
D.N.D.May 15, 2023North Dakota
Defendant Win
KAPLOW
D.N.J.May 12, 2023New Jersey
Remanded
SYDER
D.N.J.May 11, 2023New Jersey
Remanded
Goodson, Jr. v. Franklin County
S.D. OhioMay 10, 2023Ohio
Dismissed
Joseph
S.D.N.Y.May 9, 2023Minnesota
Mixed Result
Morle
E.D.N.Y.May 8, 2023New York
Defendant Win
Raine
N.D. Cal.May 8, 2023California
Defendant Win
Beall
N.D. W. Va.May 4, 2023West Virginia
Mixed Result
Gibson
S.D.N.Y.May 2, 2023New York
Defendant Win
YOUNG
E.D. Pa.May 2, 2023Pennsylvania
Mixed Result
Chen
S.D.N.Y.May 2, 2023New York
Mixed Result
Bowling
D. Colo.Apr 28, 2023Colorado
Plaintiff Win
Carr
S.D.N.Y.Apr 27, 2023New York
Remanded
Bellatoni
D. Conn.Apr 26, 2023Connecticut
Plaintiff Win
Faulkenberry
D. Md.Apr 25, 2023Maryland
Plaintiff Win$150,000 awarded
Smalls
W.D. Wash.Apr 25, 2023Washington
Dismissed

Showing 2,3012,350 of 8,273 rulings · Page 47 of 166

Think you may have a discrimination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.