Discrimination Cases

Appellant challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of her sex-discrimination and reprisal claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. ∗ Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI, § 10. 1 §§ 363A.01-.50 (2022 & Supp. 2023). Appellant's MHRA claims against respondent arise from respondent's decision to deny a promotion to appellant. Because no genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether respondent's proffered nondiscriminatory reason for declining to promote appellant was a pretext for discrimination or reprisal, we affirm. We also grant respondent's motion to strike, and we deny appellant's motions. 2

The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to appellee on appellant's race discrimination and sex discrimination claims. Judgment affirmed.