7,682 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1964–2026)
868 of 7091 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.
Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.
Civ.R. 12(B)(6), motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 623, and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 794. The trial court properly granted defendants-appellees' motion to dismiss the federal discrimination claims…
Wrongful discharge based on public policy of reporting adultery libel claims against co-workers tortious interference with contract summary judgment procedure
Wrongful discharge based on public policy of reporting adultery libel claims against co-workers tortious interference with contract summary judgment procedure
Employment discrimination reverse race discrimination reverse sex discrimination magistrate Civ.R. 53. Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant, brought an action for reverse race and reverse sex discrimination, asserting that he was asked to resign from his position as a result of discrimination.…
Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to a city where former employee failed to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination and retaliation.
Showing 3,751–3,800 of 7,682 rulings · Page 76 of 154
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.