Skip to main content
Claim Type

Discrimination Cases

8,273 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18892026)

8,273
Total Rulings
13%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$2,887,299
Avg Damages (491 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Discrimination Claims

Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3509 (42%)
Dismissed
1451 (18%)
Mixed Result
1450 (18%)
Plaintiff Win
1114 (13%)
Remanded
605 (7%)
Settlement
143 (2%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Discrimination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
94 discrimination rulings
United States Postal Service
55 discrimination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
32 discrimination rulings
United Parcel Service, Inc.
28 discrimination rulings
New York State Department of Labor
28 discrimination rulings

Court Rulings (8,273)

Bey
D.S.C.Nov 20, 2025South Carolina
Dismissed
VIDNov 20, 2025U.S. Virgin Islands
Dismissed
Head
N.D. Cal.Nov 20, 2025California
Dismissed
C.D. Cal.Nov 19, 2025California
Plaintiff Win
C.D. Cal.Nov 19, 2025California
Settlement
BRAZELLE
E.D. Pa.Nov 19, 2025Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Kelly
M.D. Ala.Nov 19, 2025Alabama
Dismissed
Martinez
D. UtahNov 19, 2025Utah
Defendant Win
Morales
M.D. Fla.Nov 18, 2025Florida
Defendant Win
Rivera
E.D. Cal.Nov 18, 2025
Dismissed
Reinauer
M.D. Fla.Nov 17, 2025Florida
Dismissed
SINICK
E.D. Pa.Nov 17, 2025Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Rodriguez
M.D. Fla.Nov 17, 2025Florida
Mixed Result
A-2404-24/a-0338-25 – Jessica Garcia v. Union City Board of Education
NJSUPERCTAPPDIVNov 17, 2025
Mixed Result
Arias
W.D. Wash.Nov 17, 2025Washington
Defendant Win
Davis
M.D. Fla.Nov 14, 2025Florida
Defendant Win
C.D. Cal.Nov 13, 2025California
Mixed Result
Griffin
W.D. Tex.Nov 12, 2025Texas
Dismissed
Wideman
HAWAPPNov 10, 2025
Defendant Win
Wheat
E.D. Cal.Nov 10, 2025California
Defendant Win
Rackovan
M.D. Pa.Nov 7, 2025Pennsylvania
Mixed Result
Silos
D. Neb.Nov 7, 2025Nebraska
Mixed Result
Collins
N.D. Ill.Nov 7, 2025Illinois
Plaintiff Win
Greene
W.D. La.Nov 7, 2025Louisiana
Dismissed
NEWMAN
M.D. Ga.Nov 7, 2025Georgia
Dismissed
Muniz
N.D. Ill.Nov 7, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Medsurant
C.D. Cal.Nov 7, 2025California
Defendant Win
Griffin
E.D. Tenn.Nov 6, 2025Tennessee
Plaintiff Win
Schaffer
S.D.N.Y.Nov 6, 2025New York
Dismissed
E.D. Cal.Nov 6, 2025Oregon
Mixed Result
Francis
E.D.N.Y.Nov 5, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Ryan
S.D.N.Y.Nov 4, 2025New York
Dismissed
Makozy
S.D. Fla.Nov 4, 2025Florida
Plaintiff Win$53,585 awarded
E.D. Cal.Nov 4, 2025California
Dismissed
Soqui
D. UtahNov 4, 2025West Virginia
Dismissed
Mastronardi Produce Limited v. NS Brands, Ltd.
W.D. Tex.Nov 4, 2025West Virginia
Mixed Result
Figueroa
M.D. Fla.Nov 4, 2025Florida
Dismissed
Vianello
D. Kan.Nov 3, 2025Kansas
Dismissed
C.D. Cal.Nov 3, 2025West Virginia
Defendant Win
LaNetra Kellar v. The Yunion, Inc.
6th CircuitOct 31, 2025
Defendant Win
Allbaugh
M.D. Pa.Oct 31, 2025Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
D.N.J.Oct 31, 2025New Jersey
Defendant Win
C.D. Cal.Oct 30, 2025California
Dismissed
Vasquez
5th CircuitOct 30, 2025
Defendant Win
Hugo
D. Or.Oct 30, 2025Oregon
Plaintiff Win
Tao
D. Kan.Oct 30, 2025Wisconsin
Dismissed
N.D. OhioOct 30, 2025Wisconsin
Mixed Result
Velazquez
S.D.N.Y.Oct 30, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Fennell
D. Md.Oct 30, 2025Maryland
Defendant Win
Paylor
D. Md.Oct 30, 2025Maryland
Plaintiff Win$900 awarded

Showing 251300 of 8,273 rulings · Page 6 of 166

Think you may have a discrimination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.