Skip to main content
Claim Type

Discrimination Cases

8,273 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18892026)

8,273
Total Rulings
13%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$2,887,299
Avg Damages (491 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Discrimination Claims

Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3509 (42%)
Dismissed
1451 (18%)
Mixed Result
1450 (18%)
Plaintiff Win
1114 (13%)
Remanded
605 (7%)
Settlement
143 (2%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Discrimination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
94 discrimination rulings
United States Postal Service
55 discrimination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
32 discrimination rulings
United Parcel Service, Inc.
28 discrimination rulings
New York State Department of Labor
28 discrimination rulings

Court Rulings (8,273)

Green
D. Colo.Oct 29, 2025Colorado
Dismissed
Islam
E.D.N.Y.Oct 28, 2025New York
Dismissed
Sanchez Garcia, Marta Del Mar v. Environmental Quality Laboratories Inc
PRAPPOct 28, 2025
Defendant Win
Lefevra
D. Mass.Oct 28, 2025Massachusetts
Dismissed
Ward
D. Or.Oct 28, 2025Oregon
Defendant Win
C.D. Cal.Oct 28, 2025California
Dismissed
Hill
W.D. Okla.Oct 28, 2025Oklahoma
Mixed Result
Bush
D.S.C.Oct 27, 2025Washington
Defendant Win
E.D.N.Y.Oct 27, 2025New York
Remanded
Stringer
S.D. OhioOct 27, 2025Ohio
Mixed Result
Kenyon
D.R.I.Oct 27, 2025Rhode Island
Defendant Win$29,856.5 at issue
Waid
E.D. Mich.Oct 24, 2025Washington
Mixed Result
House
D. Nev.Oct 24, 2025Wisconsin
Plaintiff Win
Davis
W.D. Mich.Oct 24, 2025Michigan
Dismissed
Fleming
S.D.N.Y.Oct 24, 2025New York
Plaintiff Win$250,000 awarded
Ali
D. Minn.Oct 24, 2025Minnesota
Dismissed
Mirabelli
S.D. Cal.Oct 24, 2025California
Defendant Win$5,386 at issue
ANGUS
D. Me.Oct 24, 2025Maine
Dismissed
Perry
S.D.N.Y.Oct 24, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Mirabelli
S.D. Cal.Oct 23, 2025California
Settlement
E.D.N.Y.Oct 23, 2025New York
Plaintiff Win
Azimi
W.D. Va.Oct 23, 2025Virginia
Dismissed
Bobby Lee Smith v. Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office, et al.
W.D. Okla.Oct 23, 2025Oklahoma
Mixed Result
Pauliah
S.D. Miss.Oct 23, 2025Mississippi
Defendant Win
Valandra
S.D. Miss.Oct 23, 2025Washington
Mixed Result
Chavez-DeRemer
E.D.N.Y.Oct 22, 2025New York
Dismissed
Danahy
N.D. Ill.Oct 22, 2025Illinois
Dismissed
HEAD
M.D. Ga.Oct 22, 2025Georgia
Defendant Win
Demurjian
D. Md.Oct 22, 2025Maryland
Dismissed
Batanjany
S.D.N.Y.Oct 21, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Petit
S.D.N.Y.Oct 21, 2025New York
Dismissed
Hollingsworth
W.D. Mich.Oct 21, 2025Michigan
Dismissed
Pugh
M.D. Ala.Oct 20, 2025Washington
Defendant Win
Rennalls
S.D.N.Y.Oct 20, 2025New York
Dismissed
Davidson
M.D. Tenn.Oct 20, 2025Washington
Defendant Win
D. Mass.Oct 20, 2025Massachusetts
Dismissed
M.D. Ala.Oct 20, 2025Alabama
Dismissed
Madariaga
S.D.N.Y.Oct 20, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Edwards
D. Colo.Oct 20, 2025Colorado
Defendant Win
Johns
D. Or.Oct 20, 2025Oregon
Remanded
McCormick
S.D.N.Y.Oct 20, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Galdos-Shapiro
D. Mass.Oct 17, 2025Massachusetts
Dismissed
Leuzzi
M.D. Fla.Oct 17, 2025Florida
Dismissed
Maiorino
S.D.N.Y.Oct 17, 2025New York
Dismissed
Orso
S.D. Ala.Oct 16, 2025Alabama
Dismissed
S.D.N.Y.Oct 16, 2025New York
Defendant Win$258,578.7 at issue
Dunnam
M.D. Tenn.Oct 15, 2025Tennessee
Dismissed
M.D. Fla.Oct 15, 2025Florida
Remanded
Porter
N.D.N.Y.Oct 15, 2025New York
Remanded
Cain
E.D.N.Y.Oct 15, 2025New York
Defendant Win

Showing 301350 of 8,273 rulings · Page 7 of 166

Think you may have a discrimination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.