Skip to main content
Claim Type

Discrimination Cases

8,273 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18892026)

8,273
Total Rulings
13%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$2,887,299
Avg Damages (491 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Discrimination Claims

Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3509 (42%)
Dismissed
1451 (18%)
Mixed Result
1450 (18%)
Plaintiff Win
1114 (13%)
Remanded
605 (7%)
Settlement
143 (2%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Discrimination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company
94 discrimination rulings
United States Postal Service
55 discrimination rulings
Abbott Laboratories
32 discrimination rulings
United Parcel Service, Inc.
28 discrimination rulings
New York State Department of Labor
28 discrimination rulings

Court Rulings (8,273)

Waid
E.D. Mich.Dec 10, 2025Michigan
Dismissed
Burge
M.D. Fla.Dec 10, 2025Florida
Dismissed
Saulsberry
M.D. Fla.Dec 10, 2025Florida
Dismissed
Faustin
M.D. Fla.Dec 9, 2025Florida
Defendant Win
Sly
W.D. Mo.Dec 9, 2025Missouri
Defendant Win
Berg
D. Colo.Dec 9, 2025Colorado
Dismissed
D. Nev.Dec 9, 2025Nevada
Defendant Win
Shortt
E.D.N.Y.Dec 9, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Benton
S.D. Ga.Dec 9, 2025Georgia
Defendant Win
Jacobs
W.D. Wash.Dec 8, 2025Washington
Mixed Result
Akhenaten
D. AlaskaDec 8, 2025Alaska
Settlement
MCLEAISH
N.D. Fla.Dec 8, 2025Florida
Plaintiff Win$450,000 awarded
SIMON
M.D. Ga.Dec 8, 2025Georgia
Dismissed
Curley
N.D. Cal.Dec 7, 2025California
Dismissed
White
D. Minn.Dec 5, 2025Minnesota
Dismissed
Church
E.D. Tenn.Dec 5, 2025Tennessee
Dismissed
Threlkeld
W.D. Ky.Dec 5, 2025Kentucky
Defendant Win
Fussell
N.D. Ga.Dec 5, 2025Georgia
Defendant Win
Vargas
M.D. La.Dec 5, 2025Louisiana
Defendant Win
TAFFERE
D. Me.Dec 5, 2025Maine
Dismissed
White
S.D. Ga.Dec 5, 2025Georgia
Dismissed
Gilbertson
D. Neb.Dec 4, 2025Nebraska
Defendant Win
Siegel
N.D. Cal.Dec 4, 2025California
Plaintiff Win$82,750 awarded
KELLEY
D.N.J.Dec 4, 2025New Jersey
Defendant Win
Otudeko
D. Kan.Dec 4, 2025Kansas
Dismissed
Arey
W.D. Wash.Dec 3, 2025Washington
Dismissed
West
D.S.C.Dec 3, 2025South Carolina
Defendant Win
BOOKER
E.D. Pa.Dec 3, 2025Pennsylvania
Defendant Win
Whitehead
W.D. Tenn.Dec 3, 2025Tennessee
Plaintiff Win
D.N.J.Dec 3, 2025New Jersey
Dismissed
Chima
N.D. Cal.Dec 2, 2025California
Defendant Win
N.D. Cal.Dec 2, 2025California
Dismissed
MALLORQUI-RUSCALLEDA
S.D. Ind.Dec 2, 2025Indiana
Dismissed
Walker
E.D. Cal.Dec 1, 2025California
Plaintiff Win$20,740 awarded
D. Vt.Nov 26, 2025Vermont
Mixed Result
Faris
D. Colo.Nov 26, 2025Colorado
Plaintiff Win
Logan
W.D.N.Y.Nov 26, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Young
D. UtahNov 26, 2025Utah
Dismissed
Fairley
N.D. Ill.Nov 26, 2025Illinois
Defendant Win$93,826.42 at issue
BURCH
S.D. Ind.Nov 25, 2025Indiana
Defendant Win
Loiseau
D. Conn.Nov 25, 2025Connecticut
Mixed Result
CLEMENS
E.D. Pa.Nov 24, 2025Pennsylvania
Dismissed
Minerva
E.D.N.Y.Nov 24, 2025New York
Dismissed
Coleman
D. Md.Nov 24, 2025Maryland
Dismissed
Lawson
D. Kan.Nov 24, 2025Kansas
Dismissed
Lingle
E.D. Cal.Nov 21, 2025California
Remanded
Fouts
W.D. Ky.Nov 21, 2025Kentucky
Defendant Win
King-Malone
N.D. OhioNov 21, 2025Ohio
Plaintiff Win
Rodriguez
D. Ariz.Nov 21, 2025Arizona
Settlement$125,000 awarded
KNIGHT
M.D. Ga.Nov 21, 2025Georgia
Dismissed

Showing 201250 of 8,273 rulings · Page 5 of 166

Think you may have a discrimination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.