The Sixth Circuit covers the federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 2,139 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 2,139 published rulings we track in the Sixth Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 2,123 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 563 summary-judgment rulings here, 333 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 230 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Sixth Circuit covers.
Roumeliote
OSHRC
National Labor Relations Board v. Inter-Disciplinary Advantage, Inc.
William J. Lang Land Clearing, Inc. v. Administrator, Wage & Hour Division
Adams
Totes Isotoner Corp. v. International Chemical Workers Union Council/UFCW Local 664C
DETTLING
Jones-Kelley
Doreen Fuelling v. New Vision Med. Laboratories
Kroger Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 876
Adams
Jenkins
Michigan Sugar Co. v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, & Grain Millers International Union
Tipton
Michigan Electrical Employees Pension Fund v. Encompass Electric & Data, Inc.
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 80 Pension Trust Fund v. Cooling
Wrobbel
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Hydraulics, Inc.
Broughton
Jordan
Delmas Conley v. NLRB
Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees AFL-CIO v. American Capital Strategies, Ltd.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.
01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
Innovation Ventures, L.L.C. v. Custom Nutrition Laboratories, L.L.C.
Roll Coater, Inc. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 215
Amadasu
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sharp Manufacturing Co. of America
Amadasu
National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 429
NLRB v. Intl Brotherhood
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
UAW
Jolliff
Joliff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
International Union v. MRC Industrial Group, Inc.
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers Int'l Union v. Dixie Consumer Products, LLC
Liberty Nursing Center of Willard, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 911
Conagra Foods, Inc. v. United Foods & Commercial Workers, Local Union 911
Tackett
Commercial Money Ctr v. Illinois Union Ins
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Hydraulics, Inc.
Reed
DiPietro
DELISLE
Omnicare
William J. Lang Land Clearing, Inc. v. ADMINISTRATOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION
Natl Union Fire v. Alticor Inc
American Civil Liberties Union v. Rowan County
Showing 1,351–1,400 of 2,139 rulings · Page 28 of 43
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.