The Sixth Circuit covers the federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 2,139 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 2,139 published rulings we track in the Sixth Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 2,123 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 563 summary-judgment rulings here, 333 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 230 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Sixth Circuit covers.
Sherry Jones v. Union County, Tennessee Union County Sheriff's Department
Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C v. National Labor Relations Board
Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations Board
Fewless Ex Rel. Fewless v. Board of Education of Wayland Union Schools
TNS, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Tns, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Gliatta
Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. George D. Gilley Billy Dean Goforth Century Health Services, Inc.
Fivecap, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
French
Branham
American Civil Liberties Union v. Rutherford County
AMERICAN CIV. LIB. UNION OF TN v. Rutherford Cty.
Sweeney
Ashbrook
Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.
Gooden
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Sav-A-Lot of Winchester
Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Sav-A-Lot Of Winchester
North American Dismantling Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Jones
Dixie Warehouse & Cartage Co. v. General Drivers, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local Union No. 89
Adams
Kentland Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. Noah Hall Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Detroit Newspaper Agency and Detroit News v. National Labor Relations Board, Regional Director and National Labor Relations Board, General Counsel
North American Dismantling Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Shamy Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
W.G. Fairfield Company v. The Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission Secretary of Labor
Moore
Granger
Hess
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Union Tank Car Co.
National Labor Relations Board v. Jackson Hospital Corp.
Rapier
Detroit Typographical Union, Local 18 v. Detroit Newspaper Agency, Detroit Newspaper Agency v. Detroit Typographical Union, Local 18
Speers
Wages
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Julie Shelton
Schaefer
Brewer
Sultran.
Taylor
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ESAB Group, Inc.
Ward
Koch
Doe
The Painting Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Weeden
Timken Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Iulianelli
Showing 1,801–1,850 of 2,139 rulings · Page 37 of 43
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.