The Fourth Circuit covers the federal courts in Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,632 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 1,632 published rulings we track in the Fourth Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,620 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 304 summary-judgment rulings here, 188 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 116 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Fourth Circuit covers.
EEOC v. Navy Federal Credit
ACLU
American Civil Liberties Union v. Mote
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Porter Hayden Co.
Nordan
Lombard Canada, Ltd. v. Johnson
Jefferson
Shobert
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Union Corp. Financial Group Inc.
TNT Logistics of North America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Valcourt Building Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Venugopal
Adams
Adams
Perdue Farms v. Natl Union Fire PA
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters v. National Labor Relations Board
Pace
Mashuda Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Air Contact Transport Incorporated
Cooper
National Union Fire Insurance v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
Jordan
Virginia International Terminals, Inc. v. Benny R. Edwards Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Mail Contractors of America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Henrikson
West Penn Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Media General Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Seafarers International Union
B & G Building Maintenance, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
TKC
Gary Lee James Amburn v. National Labor Relations Board, and Communications Workers of America Bellsouth Telecommunications, Incorporated, Intervenors
Pitner
Pulley
Performance Friction Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Jadali
Mining Energy, Incorporated v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department Of Labor
Kress
Paul Kress v. Food Employers Labor Relations Association
Nanette
Orantes
Colin
Hill
Venugopal
Government Employees Insurance v. Google, Inc.
Webster
United States Department of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Ass'n, Inc.
United States Department Of Labor v. North Carolina Growers Association
CSX Hotels, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
West
Showing 1,251–1,300 of 1,632 rulings · Page 26 of 33
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.