The Third Circuit covers the federal courts in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,773 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 1,773 published rulings we track in the Third Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,760 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 433 summary-judgment rulings here, 244 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 188 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Third Circuit covers.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND v. VG CONCRETE, LLC
FITZGERALD
DIFLAVIS
Adam Wenzke v. Paola Munoz
LICAUSI
MITCHELL v. COVANCE, INC.
CLAIBORNE
KIDD
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND v. DORAN TATROW ASSOCIATES, INC.
ADAMS
James
Perez
FAMILY CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION v. CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY
Attanasio
ADAMS
Walstrum
Molyneaux
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS v. NINSA, LLC.
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation v. NLRB
K.L.
Monongahela Valley Hospital v. United Steel Paper and Forestr
THULEN
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation v. NLRB
CARROW
Daniel Ferreras v. American Airlines Inc
DONDERO
THOMAS
CHARLOT
NLRB v. ImageFIRST Uniform Rental Serv
HENNESSEY
GOINS
Kioussis
BRANDON
Choate
GARVEY
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. DEMZA MASONRY LLC
BEACON SALES ACQUISITION, INC. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
ROBINSON
NEWSPAPER, NEWSPRINT, MAGAZINE AND FILM DELIVERY DRIVERS, HELPERS AND HANDLERS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 211 v. PG PUBLISHING CO. INC.
ELLIOTT
ZHANG
CHEEK
WOLFORD
MARTINEZ
STOWELL
OLIVER
BEACON SALES ACQUISITION, INC. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
SOMERSET
TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. PAPER MASTER, LLC
JACKSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SEPTA)
Showing 951–1,000 of 1,773 rulings · Page 20 of 36
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.