The Third Circuit covers the federal courts in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,773 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 1,773 published rulings we track in the Third Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,760 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 433 summary-judgment rulings here, 244 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 188 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Third Circuit covers.
Omer Masse v. APA Transp Corp
In Re Lucent Death Benefits ERISA Litigation
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.
Battoni
Local Union 30, United Union of Roofers Workers v. D.A. Nolt, Inc.
Oppong
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Be & K Engineering Co.
Mallon
Larsen
SOLAE, LLC v. Hershey Canada, Inc.
Allen
Dupont
In Re Cargill Meat Solutions
Doug Brady, Inc. v. New Jersey Building Laborers Statewide Funds
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BE&K Engineering Co.
Secretary Labor v. Roy's Constr Inc
National Labor Relations Board v. Regency Grand Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
PMC Film Canada, Inc. v. Shintech, Inc.
Cumberland Coal Res v. Secretary of Labor
Service Employees International Union v. Monsour Medical Center, Inc.
Accuride Erie, L.P. v. International Union, Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Perez
Frantz
National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 98
Norwood
Secretary Labor v. Trinity Ind Inc
Tinsley
Flake
Lehman
Secretary of Labor v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
SUPERVALU
National Labor Relations Board v. Caswell-Massey Co.
Zappone
Five Star Parking v. Union Local 723
Toy
Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Adams
Torres
Brandeburg
Klotz
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hora, Inc.
International Chemical Workers Union Council v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 2-86
AARP
American Association Of Retired Persons v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jones
Davis
Adapt of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
Steris Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Showing 1,351–1,400 of 1,773 rulings · Page 28 of 36
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.