Claim Type

Discrimination Cases

8,273 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1889–2026)

8,273

Total Rulings

13%

Plaintiff Win Rate

$2,887,299

Avg Damages (491 cases)

S.D.N.Y.

Top Court

About Discrimination Claims

Employment discrimination occurs when an employer treats an employee or applicant unfavorably because of a protected characteristic such as race, sex, age, disability, or religion. Federal laws including Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA prohibit workplace discrimination. These cases often involve claims of disparate treatment or disparate impact on protected groups.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win

3509 (42%)

Dismissed

1451 (18%)

Mixed Result

1450 (18%)

Plaintiff Win

1114 (13%)

Remanded

605 (7%)

Settlement

143 (2%)

Other

1 (0%)

Related Laws

ADA(93)NLRA(76)Title VII(8)Equal Pay Act(5)

Top Employers in Discrimination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in discrimination rulings.

Union Pacific Railroad Company

94 discrimination rulings

United States Postal Service

55 discrimination rulings

Abbott Laboratories

32 discrimination rulings

United Parcel Service, Inc.

28 discrimination rulings

New York State Department of Labor

28 discrimination rulings

Court Rulings (8,273)

M.D. Ga.Aug 27, 2024Kansas

D. Kan.Aug 27, 2024Kansas

N.D. Ala.Aug 26, 2024Alabama

D. Md.Aug 26, 2024Maryland

D. Or.Aug 26, 2024Oregon

E.D.N.Y.Aug 26, 2024New York

St. Vincent Catholic Charities v. Ingham County Board of Commissioners

W.D. Mich.Aug 26, 2024Michigan

State of Kansas v. The United States Department of Labor

S.D. Ga.Aug 26, 2024Kansas

D.S.C.Aug 26, 2024South Carolina

N.D. Cal.Aug 23, 2024California

W.D. Mich.Aug 23, 2024Michigan

M.D. Fla.Aug 23, 2024Kansas

Abiomed, Inc. v. Enmodes GmbH

D. Mass.Aug 23, 2024Massachusetts

N.D. OhioAug 23, 2024Ohio

D. Nev.Aug 23, 2024Nevada

S.D. OhioAug 22, 2024Ohio

D. Conn.Aug 22, 2024Connecticut

W.D. Ark.Aug 22, 2024Arkansas

Grant Township v. Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Kansas

D. Kan.Aug 22, 2024Kansas

Williams v. The City of New York

E.D.N.Y.Aug 22, 2024New York

D. Mass.Aug 22, 2024Massachusetts

E.D. Tenn.Aug 22, 2024Tennessee

D. Ariz.Aug 22, 2024Arizona

S.D. Cal.Aug 21, 2024California

N.D. Cal.Aug 21, 2024California

Connectors Realty Group Corporation, The v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

N.D. Ill.Aug 21, 2024Illinois

N.D. Cal.Aug 21, 2024California

D. Ariz.Aug 21, 2024Indiana

S.D. Fla.Aug 21, 2024Kansas

D. Nev.Aug 21, 2024Nevada

Larry Dunn v. John O'Groats, Inc.

C.D. Cal.Aug 21, 2024California

S.D. Cal.Aug 21, 2024California

Deondre Raglin v. The Rail LLC

C.D. Cal.Aug 20, 2024California

E.D. Pa.Aug 20, 2024Pennsylvania

E.D. Pa.Aug 20, 2024Pennsylvania

S.D. Cal.Aug 20, 2024California

S.D.N.Y.Aug 20, 2024New York

W.D.N.Y.Aug 20, 2024New York

S.D. Ill.Aug 20, 2024Illinois

W.D. Okla.Aug 20, 2024Oklahoma

Brandon Alexander v. Wayfair, LLC

C.D. Cal.Aug 19, 2024California

D.N.M.Aug 19, 2024New Mexico

Better Path Coalition Planning Group v. City of Harrisburg

M.D. Pa.Aug 19, 2024Pennsylvania

E.D. Mich.Aug 19, 2024Michigan

S.D.N.Y.Aug 19, 2024New York

Dennis Cooper v. Al Savin

C.D. Cal.Aug 19, 2024California

N.D. Cal.Aug 19, 2024California

S.D. Fla.Aug 16, 2024Florida

E.D.N.Y.Aug 16, 2024New York

N.D. Cal.Aug 16, 2024California

Showing 1,701–1,750 of 8,273 rulings · Page 35 of 166

Browse Other Claim Types

Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.

Retaliation Harassment Wrongful Termination Wage Theft Failure to Accommodate Hostile Work Environment Constructive Discharge Breach of Contract Whistleblower FMLA ADA ADA Violation

Think you may have a discrimination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Check My Rights Browse All Rulings

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.