The D.C. Circuit covers the federal courts in the District of Columbia. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 1,408 published rulings we track here (1973–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 1,408 published rulings we track in the D.C. Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 1,403 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 200 summary-judgment rulings here, 102 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 98 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the D.C. Circuit covers.
Etheridge
Quintell Etheridge v. Fedchoice Federal Credit Union
Price
Price
Trump Marina Associates, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Jackson Hospital Corp.
Shelley
Shelley
Vilsack
Vilsack
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 513 v. National Labor Relations Board
United Power Trades Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Belle
Nattah
Cruise Connections Charter Management 1, LP v. Attorney General of Canada
Cruise Connections Charter Management 1, Lp v. Attorney General of Canada
Solis
Colbert
Solis
Colbert
Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
Ferguson
Colbert
Travis
Colbert
Girma
International Union, United Mine Workers v. Mine Safety & Health Administration
Laborers' International Union v. Brand Energy Services LLC
Laborers' International Union of North America v. Brand Energy Services, LLC
Washington Teachers' Union, Local 6, American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio v. American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio
Adair
Adair
Muir
Muir
Muir
Muir
Muir
Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n of the United States & Canada v. Jordan Interiors, Inc.
Rattler
Davis
Davis
AFT.
Washington Teachers' Union, Local 6, American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio v. American Federation of Teachers, Afl-Cio
Liuna
Laborers' International Union of North America v. Brand Energy Services, LLC
Colbert
American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
American Federation of Government Employees, Local 812 v. Broadcasting Board of Governors
National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Showing 751–800 of 1,408 rulings · Page 16 of 29
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.