Employment Rulings in the Second Circuit
The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 5,280 published rulings we track here (1961–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 5,280 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 5,057 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 870 summary-judgment rulings here, 553 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 317 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- New York State Department of Labor39
- New York City Department of Education21
- United States Postal Service19
- The City of New York17
- New York City Transit Authority14
- Government Employees Insurance Company13
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Second Circuit
Simpson
K.L.A.
Iovine
Hyek
Todaro
O'Hara
Missick
Maounis
Spadaro
Fox
Birch
Frank
U.S. Information Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 3
Service Employees International, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Program
R.R., D.R. on behalf of M.R. v. Scarsdale Union Free School District
Ward
Service Employees Int'l v. Workers Comp.
Davis Ex Rel. Cr v. Wappingers Central School
Avgerinos
National Labor Relations Board v. Matros Automated Electrical Construction Corp.
Disabled Patriots of America, Inc. v. Niagara Group Hotels, LLC
Mosby
Mosby
Mosby
St. Louis v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.
JG
Anegada Master Fund, Ltd. v. PXRE Group Ltd.
Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. New York State Department of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nichols Gas & Oil, Inc.
Frumusa
Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations v. American Food & Beverage Inc.
Carlson
Wali v. One Source Co.
Quitoriano v. RAFF & BECKER, LLP.
Fowler v. SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Jock v. STERLING JEWELERS, INC.
Kelly
New York Civil Liberties Union v. New York City Transit Authority
Parks v. Office of Temporary & Disability Assistance
Naylor
Kingsbridge Heights Care Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Saint Mary Home
Meacham
Shaywitz v. American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology
Cover
Austin v. United States Department of Labor
In re Starbucks Employee Gratuity Litigation
Hendricks v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Sims
DELLAVOLPE
Showing 4,101–4,150 of 5,280 rulings · Page 83 of 106
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.