Employment Rulings in the Second Circuit
The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 5,280 published rulings we track here (1961–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
How These Rulings Ended
Of the 5,280 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
What Happens at Each Stage
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 5,057 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 870 summary-judgment rulings here, 553 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 317 let the worker’s claims continue.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Top Claim Types
Top Employers
- New York State Department of Labor39
- New York City Department of Education21
- United States Postal Service19
- The City of New York17
- New York City Transit Authority14
- Government Employees Insurance Company13
States in This Circuit
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Recent Rulings in the Second Circuit
Sarikaputar
Espada
George
Waronker
Mexican Radio Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 46 Health Fund, by Troy Milne, as Fund Manager v. Eagle Mechanical and General Construction LLC
Patterson
Hardgers-Powell
Raghavendra
Shavis
Trump
Baizan Guerrero v. 79th Street Gourmet & Deli Inc.
Benn
Welch
Moran
White
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, IUPAT, AFL-CIO v. Toprock Interiors, Inc.
Villanueva
Skelton
Silverstein
Marino
Lawrence Union Free School District v. Colonial Surety Company
Dhaliwal
Thigpen
Cunningham
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, IUPAT, AFL-CIO v. CEI Contractors, Inc.
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, IUPAT, AFL-CIO v. Pulco, Inc.
Vasquez
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the Tile Layers Local Union 52 Pension Fund v. Gibraltar Contracting, Inc.
Rochester Laborers' Welfare-S.U.B. Fund by Robert Brown as Chairman, and Daniel Hogan as Secretary v. Akwesasne Construction Inc.
Joffe
Romero
Robinson
Argudo
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. v. Local Union 1430
Garcia
The Annuity, Pension, Welfare, Training and Labor Management Cooperation Trust Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO v. Coastal Environmental Group Inc.
Astudillo
Cui
O'Kane
Nnaka
Sadat
Spires
Audino
Jones
Local One Security Officers Union v. New York University
Montanez
Morales
Lamberty
Trustees of the Northeast Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds v. Cali Enterprises, Inc.
Showing 3,501–3,550 of 5,280 rulings · Page 71 of 106
Browse Other Circuits
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.