The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,367 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 807 summary-judgment rulings here, 484 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 322 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Cibao Meat Products v. NLRB
Unite Here v. National Labor Relations Board
Casilla
Ragusa
Badawy
Medoy
Hajela
Khan
Brady
Bolmer
Rose
Hallock
Salmon Run Shopping Center LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
Salmon Run v. NLRB
Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & Agents
Hirt
Hirt
Helmes
Dow Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 910
Ramirez
Marcus
Stewart
Grandeau
L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity, Commission v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.
Employees Committed for Justice v. Eastman Kodak Co.
County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Wheeler
County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Wall
National Labor Relations Board v. Human Development Ass'n
National Labor Relations Board v. Innovative Facility Services, LC
National Labor Relations Board v. Innovative Facility Services, LC
BIRMINGHAM ASSOCIATES LTD. v. Abbott Laboratories
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 348-S, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
National Labor Relations Board v. Homer D. Bronson Co.
Smith-Barrett
Employers Insurance v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc.
Union Labor Life Insurance v. Olsten Corp. Health & Welfare Benefit Plan
Ecoline, Inc. v. Local Union No. 12 of the International Assn. of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers
Truong
Intern. Union, United Auto., Aerospace v. NLRB
International Union v. National Labor Relations Board
380544 Canada, Inc. v. Aspen Technology, Inc.
CNP Mechanical, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Rebrovich
Ragusa
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream
Garibaldi
Showing 3,551–3,600 of 4,502 rulings · Page 72 of 91
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.