The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,367 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 807 summary-judgment rulings here, 484 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 322 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Cave
Cave
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thomas Dodge Corp.
Local 78, Asbestos, Lead & Hazardous Waste Laborers v. Termon Construction, Inc.
Shannon
Murray
Vargas
Ghent
Payne
Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority
Transport Wkrs. Union Local 100 v. NYC Transit Authority
Tuccio
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nichols Gas & Oil, Inc.
County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp.
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
NONI
Gentile
Pereira
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concrete Applied Construction Technologies Corp.
Holt
S. Strauss, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 342
O'ROURKE
United States ex rel. Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. v. Westchester County
Rivera
Mathews
NYP Holdings, Inc. v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union of New York & Vicinity
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. LLC v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342
Crew of the Debtors' Vessels, Maritime Transport Workers' Union v. Allfirst Bank
Amadasu
Dow Electric, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 910
Pender
Russo
Drywall Tapers & Pointers of Greater New York, Local Union 1974 of I.U.P.A.T., AFL-CIO v. Nastasi & Associates Inc.
DRYWALL TAPERS AND POINTERS OF GREATER NEW YORK, LOCAL UNION 1974 OF v. NASTASI & ASSOCIATES INC.
Kain
Bay Shore Union Free School District v. Thomas Kain
Perry
Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. CROUSE-COMMUNITY CENTER, INC.
NYP Holdings, Inc. v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union
O'CONNOR
325 Bleecker, Inc. v. Local Union No. 747
Vail-Ballou Press, Inc. v. Graphic Communications International Union/International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 898-M
Caruso
Lord
Cave
Bennett
Johnson v. County of Nassau
In Re Guadalupe
Port Washington Teachers' Association v. Board Of Education Of The Port Washington Union Free School District
Consub Delaware LLC v. Schahin Engenharia Limitada
Showing 3,601–3,650 of 4,502 rulings · Page 73 of 91
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.