The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,367 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 807 summary-judgment rulings here, 484 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 322 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Solomon
National Union Fire Insurance v. Las Vegas Professional Football Ltd. Partnership
Cirincione
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bloomberg L.P.
Adams
Harper
Sebast
Local Union 36, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
In Re American Exp. Co. Erisa Litigation
Weber
B.D.S.
Suffolk Federal Credit Union v. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.
Labarbera
DeFabio
Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. Swiss Reinsurance Co.
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund v. Arbitron Inc.
GB
Lindor
Deveer
Perry
Saaidi
Pellegrini
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. MF Global, Ltd.
Iowa Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. MF Global, Ltd.
Federation of Union Representatives v. Unite Here
Eibeler
Kleehammer
National Labor Relations Board v. E-Z Supply Corp.
National Labor Relations Board v. E-Z Supply Corp.
Fortune
In Re Bank of America Corp.
Villanti
Mascaro Construction v. Local No. 210, Laborers International
Laborers Int'l Union of North America, Local 210 v. McKinney Drilling Co.
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Talley
Guadagni
Patterson
Suffolk Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
Carter
Zaidi
In Re Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation
Filippi
County Waste of Ulster, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Domsey Trading Corp.
Howd v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 919
NLRB v. Domsey Trading Corp.
Scheffer
National Labor Relations Board v. Talmadge Park
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Talmadge Park
Showing 3,301–3,350 of 4,502 rulings · Page 67 of 91
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.