The Second Circuit covers the federal courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The rulings below come from the circuit's court of appeals and the federal trial courts within it.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track here (1964–2026), the breakdowns below show how they were decided. They describe published opinions only — not the odds of any particular situation.
Of the 4,502 published rulings we track in the Second Circuit.
A workplace lawsuit moves through stages, and a ruling can end it at any of them. Here is where the 4,367 rulings we could classify by stage were decided.
A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
A ruling where the judge decides the case — or part of it — without a trial, because one side argues the key facts are not in dispute. For workers, getting past this step is often the biggest hurdle.
Of the 807 summary-judgment rulings here, 484 ended the case in the employer’s favor and 322 let the worker’s claims continue; the rest resolved in other ways.
An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
A judge or jury heard the evidence and reached a decision. Relatively few disputes get this far.
The two sides resolved the dispute by agreement, sometimes with court approval. Most settlements are private and never show up in published opinions.
A decision entered because one side did not respond to the case at all.
Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Browse rulings from courts in each state the Second Circuit covers.
Granito
Etienne
National Labor Relations Board v. Orange County Publications
Kinsella
Huskins
Rizzo
Girma
Kent
International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 17 v. Swank Associated Co.
The Attorney General of Canada v. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.
Becker
Diehl
Sabatini
National Labor Relations Board v. G & T Terminal Packaging Co.
Tyszka
Nucifora
Wolfe
Chille
Alfieri
Gardner
Wall
Betal Environmental Corp. v. Local Union Number 78
Bucklen
Tremper
National Labor Relations Board v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation
Ball
Hotaling
Finn-Verburg
Detje
Newspaper Guild of New York, Local No. 3 of the Newspaper Guild, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and Nyp Holdings, Inc., Intervenor
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rotary Corp.
Johnny Wilder, Susan Chana Lask v. Gl Bus Lines, International Bus Services, Inc., and Transport Workers Union of America, Local 225
Local 323 v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine & Furniture Workers
Moss
National Labor Relations Board, v. Quinnipiac College
Jones-Blair
McDaniel Ford, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Harrington
Julia Santos v. Knitgoods Workers' Union, Local 155, and Patricia Grosso, as President of Knitgoods Workers' Union, Local 155, Unite
Johnson v. New York City Employees Income Retirement System Pension Plan
National Labor Relations Board v. Mt. Sinai Hospital
National Labor Relations Board v. Valentine Painting & Wallcovering, Inc.
Blyer Ex Rel. NLRB v. P & W ELEC., INC.
Frudakis
Susko
Pealo
District 6, International Union of Industrial v. National Mediation Board of the United States
Allen
Sherwood
American Stevedoring Limited v. Victor Marinelli, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. Of Labor
Showing 4,051–4,100 of 4,502 rulings · Page 82 of 91
Explore employment rulings from the other federal circuits.
These figures summarize publicly available published court opinions only. Published opinions over-represent summary-judgment rulings (decisions made without a trial) and appeals, because those are the stages where judges most often write formal opinions. Most workplace disputes settle privately and never appear here at all. A ruling’s outcome reflects many case-specific factors and is not a prediction for any other situation. Read more about how we source and classify rulings.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of outcomes and case stages is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.