Harassment Cases
1,040 employment law court rulings from public federal records (1980–2026)
150 of 940 adjudicated opinions ended in a plaintiff win.
About Harassment Claims
Workplace harassment involves unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic that creates a hostile or intimidating work environment. To be actionable, harassment must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. Employers may be liable for harassment by supervisors, coworkers, or even non-employees in certain circumstances.
Case Outcomes
Top Employers in Harassment Cases
Employers most frequently appearing in harassment rulings.
Court Rulings (1,040)
A plaintiff-employee states a valid claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy where she claims that she was an at-will employee and was fired for filing a good-faith complaint with her employer and with OSHA concerning COVID-19 hazards and a mice infestation in her workplace. In a…
CIVIL - civil stalking protection order; R.C. 2903.214; ex parte; harassment and threats; social media; screenshots; hearing before magistrate; objections filed; no transcript of proceedings; trial court adopted magistrate's decision; weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; Civ.R.…
The Madison County Grand Jury indicted Defendant, Andre Davis, Jr., for one count each of harassment and aggravated stalking. A jury found Defendant guilty as charged, and the trial court imposed an effective two-year sentence. Defendant appeals and argues that the evidence was insufficient to…
Showing 151–200 of 1,040 rulings · Page 4 of 21
Browse Other Claim Types
Explore rulings by type of employment law claim.
Think you may have a harassment claim?
Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.