Skip to main content
Claim Type

Wrongful Termination Cases

6,866 employment law court rulings from public federal records (18632026)

6,866
Total Rulings
23%
Plaintiff Win Rate
$1,340,684
Avg Damages (488 cases)
S.D.N.Y.
Top Court

About Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination claims arise when an employee is fired in violation of federal or state law, public policy, or an employment contract. While most employment is at-will, employers cannot terminate employees for illegal reasons such as discrimination, retaliation, or exercising legal rights. These cases examine whether the stated reason for termination was pretextual.

Case Outcomes

Defendant Win
3045 (44%)
Plaintiff Win
1585 (23%)
Mixed Result
1115 (16%)
Remanded
569 (8%)
Dismissed
460 (7%)
Settlement
91 (1%)
Other
1 (0%)

Top Employers in Wrongful Termination Cases

Employers most frequently appearing in wrongful termination rulings.

Court Rulings (6,866)

Pablo
D. Or.Jan 17, 2025Oregon
Remanded
Shank
INNDJan 16, 2025New York
Mixed Result
EARLES
D. Me.Jan 16, 2025Maine
Mixed Result
Arriola
S.D.N.Y.Jan 16, 2025New York
Mixed Result
Ducos
M.D. Fla.Jan 16, 2025Florida
Mixed Result
Estrada Delgado, Lydia v. Municipio De San Juan
PRAPPJan 15, 2025
Defendant Win
Howard
W.D. Wash.Jan 14, 2025Washington
Dismissed
G.E.S.
E.D. Mo.Jan 13, 2025Missouri
Defendant Win
Howard University Hospital v. D.C. Department of Employment Services
DCJan 10, 2025
Plaintiff Win
Department of Labor v. Americare Healthcare Services, LLC
S.D. OhioJan 9, 2025Ohio
Plaintiff Win$7,478,820.79 awarded
Schall
D. Neb.Jan 8, 2025New York
Plaintiff Win
Adams
W.D. La.Jan 8, 2025Louisiana
Dismissed
McPherson
E.D.N.Y.Jan 7, 2025New York
Plaintiff Win
Bentley
DELSUPERCTJan 7, 2025
Plaintiff Win
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Eastbox, LLC
E.D. Tex.Jan 7, 2025Texas
Defendant Win
Oellien
E.D. Tenn.Jan 6, 2025Tennessee
Dismissed
Lee v. Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School Dist. CA2/5
Cal. Ct. App.Jan 6, 2025
Defendant Win
LIPANI, M.D. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO.
D.N.J.Jan 6, 2025New Jersey
Defendant Win
U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ecoserve L L C
W.D. La.Jan 6, 2025Louisiana
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Charles Housing, LP
E.D.N.Y.Jan 6, 2025New York
Defendant Win
Reyes
S.D.N.Y.Jan 6, 2025New York
Dismissed
Povinelli
S.D.N.Y.Jan 6, 2025New York
Plaintiff Win$36,868 awarded
Romero
D. Ariz.Jan 6, 2025Arizona
Remanded
Moncada
NYSUPCTNEWYORKJan 3, 2025
Mixed Result
Ramachandran
N.D. Cal.Jan 3, 2025California
Plaintiff Win
Moncada
NYSUPCTNEWYORKJan 3, 2025
Plaintiff Win
Rashid
D. Nev.Jan 3, 2025Nevada
Mixed Result
Mario Mendoza v. Christina Diaz Alvarez
C.D. Cal.Jan 2, 2025California
Remanded
Waithaka
W.D. Wash.Dec 31, 2024Washington
Dismissed
Vilk
N.D. OhioDec 31, 2024Ohio
Mixed Result
Fidelis Johnson Badaiki v. Steve McKenzie, Schlumberger Holdings Corporation
Tex. App.—1st Dist.Dec 31, 2024
Settlement
M.H.
D. IdahoDec 31, 2024Idaho
Plaintiff Win
Yaakov Markel v. Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America
9th CircuitDec 30, 2024
Defendant Win
Topkov
W.D. Okla.Dec 30, 2024Oklahoma
Plaintiff Win$147,711.93 awarded
RICHARDS
VIRGINISLANDSDec 27, 2024
Remanded
Bruemmer
Ohio Ct. App.Dec 27, 2024

EMPLOYMENT – CORPORATIONS – MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS – WRONGFUL DISCHARGE – BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY – CONTRACTS - RELEASES: The trial court did not err in granting a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants majority shareholders on plaintiff minority shareholder's claims for breach of fiduciary duty and wrongful discharge where the evidence showed that the termination of plaintiff's employment had a legitimate business purpose. The trial court did not err in granting plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaim for damages based on the terms of two releases contained in two redemption agreements, where the clear and unambiguous language of the agreements showed that they only governed the purchase of plaintiff's ownership interest in the companies, not his employment relationship with the companies.

Defendant Win
Reid
E.D.N.Y.Dec 27, 2024New York
Dismissed
Julio Cruz v. Grace-Trinity Trading, Inc.
C.D. Cal.Dec 27, 2024New York
Plaintiff Win$16,199.38 awarded
Phillips
Ohio Ct. App.Dec 26, 2024

constructive discharge, hostile work environment, reverse racial discrimination, negligent hiring/retention/supervision

Defendant Win
Chand
N.D. Cal.Dec 26, 2024California
Dismissed
Shaw-Hicks
DELSUPERCTDec 23, 2024
Mixed Result
Gagnon
D. Md.Dec 23, 2024Maryland
Plaintiff Win
Shaw-Hicks
DELSUPERCTDec 23, 2024
Mixed Result
Soni
Ill. App. Ct.Dec 20, 2024
Plaintiff Win
Blankinship
D. Ariz.Dec 20, 2024Arizona
Defendant Win
In Re Grievance of David Roos
VTDec 20, 2024Vermont
Defendant Win
Krajewski
D. Neb.Dec 20, 2024Nebraska
Mixed Result
Kar
Ohio Ct. App.Dec 18, 2024

Motion for staying pending arbitration denied; appellee, an orthodontist, entered seven contracts with a dental alliance; some contracts had arbitration clauses and employee restrictive covenants, some did not; the restrictive covenants in the contracts were not the same; appellant filed declaratory judgment and breach of contract action; dental alliance followed by filing for arbitration; court did not err by not granting stay pending arbitration because parties agreed to the stay; court did not err in retaining jurisdiction over the case due to conflicting provisions in the contracts; although public policy favors arbitration, arbitration clauses are not elevated over other contract provisions; questions of arbitrability are decided by the court unless delegated to the arbitrator; the contracts did not contain delegation clauses; a venue clause does not typically conflict with an arbitration clause; judgment affirmed.

Plaintiff Win
Ghant
D.S.C.Dec 18, 2024South Carolina
Defendant Win
Reese
S.D.N.Y.Dec 17, 2024New York
Mixed Result

Showing 501550 of 6,866 rulings · Page 11 of 138

Think you may have a wrongful termination claim?

Check which employment laws may protect you — free, private, and no sign-up required.

Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The classification of claim types is based on automated analysis and may not reflect the full scope of each case.