Wrongful Termination Cases

The trial court did not err in dismissing appellant's claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, because the facts alleged by appellant failed as a matter of law to establish the clarity element of her claim. The trial court also did not err in dismissing appellant's declaratory judgment claim where it and the wrongful termination claim were indistinguishable. Judgment affirmed.

R.C. 3319.16, good and just cause for termination, remedies for wrongful termination

reversing the denial of summary judgment motion filed by political subdivision and employees, who were immune from liability; no evidence of negligence as required for the immunity exceptions involving the operation of a motor vehicle or the performance of a proprietary function; no duty; no recklessness as required to defeat primary assumption of the risk doctrine; employees' performance was not manifestly outside scope of employment or reckless.